Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Has Delay blinked?
1 posted on 02/09/2005 9:01:35 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: gubamyster

Ping.


2 posted on 02/09/2005 9:02:48 AM PST by Marine Inspector (Customs & Border Protection Officer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

...."could entail"....

How 'bout SHALL


3 posted on 02/09/2005 9:04:46 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
requiring illegal immigrants to return to their native countries to apply for the program, Mr. DeLay said.

That's one way to get them the heck out of this country to never return!

4 posted on 02/09/2005 9:07:30 AM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Such a compromise could entail, for example, requiring illegal immigrants to return to their native countries to apply for the program, Mr. DeLay said

Excellent. Let's change the "could entail" to "shall entail", then it sounds like a plan.

5 posted on 02/09/2005 9:08:38 AM PST by spodefly (Yo, homey ... Is that my briefcase?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

"Has Delay blinked?"

Not necessarily. I do believe this was one of the cornerstones of Tancredo's guest worker bill. This may be Delays way of pushing Tancredo's proposal as a 'compromise'.

What we DONT want is Cornyns guest worker bill proposal. He is the Senate manager of Bushs 'proposal', is this coincidence?

Awhile back, there was a link posted in a thread to a comparison chart on the various proposals. Somebody may remember who posted it.


6 posted on 02/09/2005 9:09:28 AM PST by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

The skids are greased for FTAA...


7 posted on 02/09/2005 9:10:08 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

So, dare we guess WHO was REALLY behind the
"return to country of origin to gain legal
access" as a guest worker? Come on...
think about it! <>g<>


9 posted on 02/09/2005 9:13:40 AM PST by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

How about this compromise?

W. shuts up about burying the nation in illegals and Delay promises not to impeach him.


10 posted on 02/09/2005 9:14:36 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

The source of much of our illigal immigration problems is the deplorable socio-economic conditions of much of Latin America. On paper, many of these countries have democratic governments. In reality, they are ruled by an elite aristocracy that comprises at most, 10% of the population. These governments don't oppress their people in ways that would risk military intervention by us; rather, they oppress them by depriving them of opportunities to improve their standard of living. Those in power down there know that if general economic conditions improve, they would be out of power. The sad thing is that this situation to our south isn't much different from the northeastern parts of our own nation.


11 posted on 02/09/2005 9:15:30 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
I believe that any guest worker program should have a stipulation that if a citizen applies for the job the non citizen loses it.
12 posted on 02/09/2005 9:19:01 AM PST by CONSERVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla; All

Really interesting debate NOW on CSPAN on the house floor about the REAL ID ACT, HR. 418. It's apparent who is in the OBL pocket!


35 posted on 02/09/2005 11:07:29 AM PST by JustAnotherSavage ("We are all sinners. But jerks revel in their sins." PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
"Has Delay blinked?"

Not at all, if one applies from one's home country then they are not illegal. This is excellent, but I would like to hear more about Enforcement. Enforcement real emforcement is the key.

36 posted on 02/09/2005 11:13:03 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

It still doesn't penalize or punish people for entering and remaining illegally. It still rewards them for doing so. Do we enforce our laws or not? That is the question.


39 posted on 02/09/2005 11:37:40 AM PST by KiloLima (January 30, 2005: A date that will live in our hearts and minds . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Fine those who employ illegals $1000 per illegal, first time; $10,000 per illegal, second time; and progressively increase the fine.

Mandate that illegals caught will be conscripted and required to perform 2 years minimum of military service.

[Watch them scatter back to Mexico.]


50 posted on 02/09/2005 12:33:04 PM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

My suggestion for a compromise bill would be one requiring placement of troops on the southern border, three feet apart, and welcome "guest workers" who score 150 or more on a standard IQ test administered by the Border Patrol. Anyone hoping to enter scoring less than that would be turned back.


51 posted on 02/09/2005 12:33:18 PM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
I couldn't get into the article you linked w/o registering... which I don't want to do. I have read several "versions" of this news story today. I am giving DeLay the benefit of the doubt here. Requiring illegals to go back to the native homeland to register is a good idea. Not that I think enough of them would do it. DeLay typically stands his ground on issues he believes and issues that are important to his constituents. I will be surprised if he buckles under on this... we will see.
53 posted on 02/09/2005 12:38:52 PM PST by exhaustedmomma (Calling illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a burglar an uninvited house guest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
....sounds reasonable, they broke the law....so let the onus be on them.

Give the 6 months to return to their own country...find an employer here in the US who will hire them, and when matched with an employer, they can come (back) in. I still do not see why these lawbreakers should be granted the privilege of American citizenship.
59 posted on 02/09/2005 12:59:17 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Hi-b has already proven what guest worker programs do, they displace Americans from their jobs. Matching "willing employer with employee" will mean the end of the middle class as we know it so Delay and the GOP better make their plans ahead of time to get future votes from all the guest workers they allow in.


69 posted on 02/09/2005 1:20:01 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla; All
Heres another beef of mine.

Personally, I am opposed to all guest worker bills on general principle, as I feel that they can be misused by employers to distort and usurp natural labor market supply and demand.

We have already seen how this has been done in the tech sector using the H1b classification. Do some research, and discover how the IEEE-USA feels about H1b.

Although some try to advocate these policies from a libertarian viewpoint, I feel that they are actually contrary to libertarian principles, insofar as they allow the government to indirectly regulate the labor market, using legislative categories, exemptions and allocations, and thus give an unfair advantage to certain companies at the expense of the general public and other companies. This amounts to indirect government interference in private enterprise.

Now, immigration of desirable people with good job skills is another matter. I am not opposed to increasing immigration quotas, provided that strict criteria are met.

First and foremost, there has to be a demonstrated need for a certain labor classification, skill or aptitude.

Second, the applicant should express a desire to become a productive American citizen. They should also have some minimal facility with the English language, OR be willing to learn as part of their naturalization process.

Third, quotas should be assigned to countries across the board, not just one or two, with preference given to those who have stood by us as allies in the past.

Now, with all this talk of "family values" as they apply to immigrants, I say if we want that as part of our criteria, then we should also be assigning an equal number of slots to Poland, as well as to Mexico.

You will not find a more solid, Catholic country than Poland, with solid family values. Also, they have been a faithful ally in Iraq and elsewhere. I would also give preference to Britain and Ireland.
75 posted on 02/09/2005 2:28:52 PM PST by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Immigration deal!? What deal? We need a deal to keep people from entering this country illegally.

If the Republicans do not get this issue in hand and quickly, they will find themselves in trouble starting with the next election. This one can not be ignorned. There is no deal to make.

111 posted on 02/09/2005 6:07:04 PM PST by BJungNan (Please stand by while I think up a new one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson