Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dat Mon; jveritas; bayourod; Howlin; Once-Ler
It's funny but Tancredo's plan isn't that dissimilar from what President Bush has proposed and yet certain people will trash the President at every opportunity but in the same line they will elevate Tancredo to the level of a god.
14 posted on 02/09/2005 9:21:09 AM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: COEXERJ145

I tend to read most of the threads on illegal immigration, and it appears to me that it is YOU (et al) that is fixated on Tancredo.

Most people just seem to want a plan that isn't an amnesty, stealth or otherwise. Tancredo is among the few that has that clearly outlined. That doesn't make him a god or anything else but someone that has proposed a plan that isn't an amnesty.


20 posted on 02/09/2005 9:33:37 AM PST by spodefly (Yo, homey ... Is that my briefcase?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145

To append to my previous post, it seems to me that most people just want the existing laws enforced. The biggest question I have, regardless of whether it is about the Bush plan or the Tancredo plan or whatever plan is this: If the will is not there to enforce the existing laws, how will passing more laws help?


23 posted on 02/09/2005 9:37:40 AM PST by spodefly (Yo, homey ... Is that my briefcase?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145
I don't know how you can make that statement , as nobody has seen any concrete language on Bush's proposal. All Bush has done is lay out guidelines. The philosophy articulated by Bush..."family values don't stop at the border"..."jobs Americans wont do", when coupled with the fact that the present border security and enforcement that we have is inadequate, gives people a bad bad feeling.

Check out the comparison table posted by nodolli, it shows the differences between the various proposals that are presently ON THE TABLE.
25 posted on 02/09/2005 9:41:53 AM PST by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145
"Returning to their home country to apply." may appease the anti-Mexican crowd, but it won't make much difference to the illegals from Mexico. They go back to Mexico regularly anyway for Christmas, funerals, birthdays etc...

But for the ones from China or Lebanon it might not be possible.

So more Mexicans will have to come over to replace the Asian illegals.

29 posted on 02/09/2005 9:52:58 AM PST by bayourod (Unless we get over 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145
It's funny but Tancredo's plan isn't that dissimilar from what President Bush has proposed and yet certain people will trash the President at every opportunity but in the same line they will elevate Tancredo to the level of a god.

It's as different as night and day, you are disengenious or uninformed......Presidente Bush needs to be aware of how the people feel...not just those that exploit the illegals...

33 posted on 02/09/2005 10:04:56 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145

I am just sick of you and your crowd trying to polarize this issue rather than discuss it reasonably. No one in this thread has talked about Tancredo being a god; you're just using that to bait people. How about discussing the issue rather than other posters? Have you tried that? Or are you, as usual, spoiling for a fight?


41 posted on 02/09/2005 11:43:37 AM PST by KiloLima (January 30, 2005: A date that will live in our hearts and minds . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145

Wasn't Tancredo's "plan" calling for one year instead of three year intervals?

Do you know how many "anchors" can be dropped in three years?

I'd opt for a shorter term, but the logistics might not be feasible. Maybe a compromise of 18 mo's with restrictions that no child born to immigrants in the program are eligible for citizenship or taxpayer funded benefits unless one parent is a citizen of the U.S.

I'd like to think there is plenty of ground for compromise to handle the problem - but the proposals have to be comprehensive in nature, ie. SSI, legal identities, immigrant quotas, the host country's willingness to reimburse the taxpayer for benefits acquired by immigrants, etc..


52 posted on 02/09/2005 12:37:22 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145

LOL....quite an illegal apologist ping list ya got going there mate.

LOL
;)


60 posted on 02/09/2005 1:00:26 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson