Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doctor Stochastic

Well, it ain't hollow, so actually, you are all just wasting keystrokes.

The core of the Earth is the remains of a star.

The star goes supernova, eventually collapses into a neutron star with the attendant black hole.

Sooner or later, the star cools and expands, due to accretion of materials it has pulled in with it's gravity (which is a function of electromagnetic type forces still not understood, created by the energy source of the burning engine of the star).

The star loses it's black hole at an early stage in it's expansion.

If it has accrued enough matter, and doesn't expand too fast, it's rate of growth slows, and material continues to pile up, building a shell, or containment field, for the inner stellar furnace.

The EM type field emitted by the inner core is what causes the astral body to spin.

The solidified, cooled outer shell becomes the surface of a livable planet, with the inner furnace which generates beneficial EM and other type fields (Van Allen radiation belts), causes spin, solar inclination, gravity, generates ozone, and makes life possible.

All cold, all hot, no life. Center hot, outside cool, life. Star core= Shields up. The 'fields' provide protection from the harmful(to us) emissions in the EM spectrum.

This star cored shell, a life bearing planet, is similar to the creature you are made up of.

A Eukaryote, a cell with an internal engine/furnace.

Or, to qoute a famous source, "As Above(the heavens), So Below."


85 posted on 02/10/2005 4:46:41 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (sH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2; Doctor Stochastic; RadioAstronomer

this is a joke reply, yes?


88 posted on 02/10/2005 5:06:04 PM PST by King Prout (Remember John Adam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
I believe that *some* of what you say here is correct.
1. The Earth is indeed not hollow (what a surprise!)
2. The Earth, and everything on it, is "starstuff".

Now, here's the kicker-
3. The "stuff" isn't from a single star. It's from LOTS of stars. A supernova spreads matter over an incredibly wide area. Have you ever looked at the Orion Nebula? That's "starstuff" as well, and new stars are forming inside it. Same with the Eagle Nebula. Same with lots of nebula. Some of those stars have accretion disks of matter that is caught by the gravity of the system. Yep- more of that "starstuff" there. Some of that matter may get together and form planets around those stars.
4. A star that becomes a neutron star after going supernova does *not* have an "attendant black hole". If you have evidence to the contrary, I'd love to see it.
5. Neutron stars are *massive*. On average, about 1.4 solar masses, and about 20 km in diameter. We *know* the mass of the Earth, and it isn't even close to that.

Again, if you have published evidence stating otherwise, do share.
102 posted on 02/12/2005 6:49:05 PM PST by Dawsonville_Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson