And then the dead baby is thrown in the garbage.
Posted on 02/12/2005 9:47:53 AM PST by UpHereEh
Did some reading about protecting our Canadian wildlife, by which I don't mean the annual "Gay Pride" parade along English Bay in Vancouver. No, that wildlife festival has very little to do with 'the birds and the bees' -- and I couldn't mean that more literally.
That wildlife parade is designed to promote homosexuality and force social acceptance of their gay and lesbian lifestyle. Gay men barely dressed in G-strings and bras upon festively decorated parade floats dance lewdly with each other and wildly thrust their barely covered testicles -- at child's-eye level -- back and forth to unsuspecting little girls and boys who, with mommy and daddy, are watching what they thought was simply a good old-time traditional parade, such as you might expect on a summer Sunday along our public streets and parks.
At least the unsuspecting folks won't be subjected to images of a "Christmas" -- I mean a "happy tree festivus" -- nativity scene in the public square, thank God... or you know, whatever.
No by wildlife I naturally mean the slugs, frogs, eagles, and other such wildlife that are protected by Canadian laws, well thought-out and vetted by courts and the Kennedys of Massachusetts.
So we can't kill eagle eggs, at the risk of going to jail and being heavily fined. That's good. It would be immoral to kill the larvae, embryos, eggs, or sperm of American Bald Eagles. We all agree. Even liberals who hate America.
But oh goodie: an opportunity to get liberals to go ballistic about their self-professed "right" to their choice to kill human babies -- also known in Canada as snuffing out the life of tiny humans who apparently don't even have the inherent right to live, much less get a homosexual 'marriage' which is a God-given right, apparently "flowing from" -- or even "naturally flowing from" (in an even bigger abomination) our sacred Charter of Rights, according to Liberal Minister of Gay Marriage, Irwin Cotler.
According to a Statistics Canada report released today, the number of taxpayer-funded abortions in Canada sits at well over 100,000 per year and decreased only nominally lately.
Thanks to the liberal-left in this country which is pro-abortion and doesn't believe in protecting the right to life of unborn humans in the womb, Canada has no laws against abortion. The liberal-left don't believe in all humans having basic rights, such as the right to, you know, "live" -- until they decide these little ones have that God-given right.
The liberal-left have found nothing in their sacred Charter of Rights -- nothing! -- to protect the life of tiny humans incapable of speaking for themselves -- you know, that "minority". They can't even find anything to "read into", nor can they find any such rights that "flow from" the Charter of Rights that might protect the lives of the unborn. This despite the fact that the Charter of Rights begins with the line: "Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law" (it doesn't read, it should be noted, "...upon the supremacy of liberals...").
I should clarify that I've been referring to their "sacred" Charter of Rights, which is of course a misnomer in actual fact. The Liberals so often get themselves confused with what's sacred and who's sacred. For example, they think they are God and since the Charter of Rights was created by Liberals, it is in fact deemed "sacred" by them. And yet that's wrong. So it isn't sacred, really. The document merely indicates that it, like conservatives, are on the side of God -- they are not in fact God themselves, each and every one of them. Someday maybe liberals will sort that out.
Women in Canada of any age can get an abortion at any time in their pregnancy -- even up to the very moment of delivery -- for any reason at all whatsoever, no questions asked, at their demand, and at our cost of course because it's a pro-liberal procedure.
And all abortions are paid for by all Canadian taxpayers, by law. Even abortions committed in private abortion mills -- or "clinics" as they like to call them, as if "pregnancy" was an illness -- even abortions committed in evil American private clinics in the United States -- they're also paid for by Canadian taxpayers.
Of course most abortions are committed in public Canadian taxpayer-funded hospitals.
The abortions obtained by Canadian women in some U.S. states are usually the "late-term" abortions. Those are the ones performed in the late stages of pregnancy -- even right up to the moment of delivery.
In fact the procedure, known as an intact dilation and extraction, is known also as a partial birth abortion, in which the live baby is partially delivered, then killed. Most doctors won't do it here in Canada for their own ethical reasons, and interestingly they aren't compelled by law to do so, unlike marriage commissioners who are forced to quit their jobs rather than perform 'marriages' between homosexuals. So the Canadian government spends our tax dollars to ship the women to the U.S. where there are abortion mills willing and capable of performing the ritual and happy to take anybody's money.
"The procedure is usually performed during the fifth month of gestation or later. The woman's cervix is dilated, and the fetus is partially removed from the womb, feet first. The surgeon inserts a sharp object into the back of the fetus' head, removes it, and inserts a vacuum tube through which the brains are extracted. The head of the fetus contracts at this point and allows the fetus to be more easily removed from the womb."
These color illustrations of a partial-birth abortion were prepared on the basis of an instructional paper by an Ohio abortionist, explaining step by step how he performs the procedure. These drawings accurately depict a partial-birth abortion being performed on a baby at 24 weeks gestational age. Most partial-birth abortions are performed in the 20-26 week range (the fifth and sixth months), and some are performed even later.
And then the dead baby is thrown in the garbage.
ping
There are times when I wonder how long God can hold back His anger against those who continue to support the gruesome practice of partial birth abortion. May all the lies and deceptions concerning this horrific murder of the innocent be revealed.
Unfortunately, yes it is true. They can get an abortion right up to delivery. :o(
I believe that if they did, it would bring a screeching halt to it.
The abortionists/libs would holler loudly to stop these photos from being shown - "too graphic!" -
well, they are graphic - horrifically so - but far less horrible than the act.
It has always puzzled me how any doctor could perform this murder...how do they look themselves in the mirror>
It is up to us to save these tiny lives..."unto these, my little ones" - If not, why should we expect God to stand by this country - or any country - that slaughters his little lambs by the millions.
Not to mention - the enemies of our countries, such as the murderous factions of the Muslims, do not slaughter their babies. who is going to outnumber us soon?
Messed up the last one. Is it true "Women in Canada of any age can get an abortion at any time in their pregnancy -- even up to the very moment of delivery"? Surely they have limits on how many weeks of age they can "dispose" of their child?
no - not here either.
this is why this must be splashed across the country - it is an act so horrific that decent people cannot conceive of it - time for America to wake up.
I wonder if there isn't some way these photos could be widely disseminated? It's the only way people will finally rise up
There are no limits in Canada whatsoever. In addition, the legal age of consent in Canada is 14 years old. So a 14 year old girl can have an abortion at 9 months no questions asked, without the consent or knowledge of her parents. God help us!!
Who has the pro-lifer ping list?
I didn't read the rest of the article but I wonder if the writer mentions what I jokingly said to a pro-choicer I debated on this matter, that abortion is wrong to perform on animals because it's not the animal's choice. (The response was more or less agreement, to which I responded "Funny how no animal chooses to get an abortion of its own free will in any case." Yes, I know animals don't have free will but I was arguing with one of those crunchy granola New Agey prochoicers whose apartment had a lot of candles lit.)
CHAPTER 74 -- PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTIONS
"Sec.
"1531. Partial-birth abortions prohibited
§1531. Partial-birth abortions prohibited
(a) Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. This subsection does not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself. This subsection takes effect 1 day after the date of enactment of this chapter.
(b) As used in this section --
(1) the term 'partial-birth abortion' means an abortion in which --
(A) the person performing the abortion deliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living fetus until, in the case of a head-first presentation, the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the case of breech presentation, any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother for the purpose of performing an overt act that the person knows will kill the partially delivered living fetus
No wonder they have resorted to handing out "clean" needles (Vancouver) and now they're getting ready to conduct a free heroin study. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1341825/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1341725/posts
It just send chills down my spine when I think of how often this butchery takes place. I feel confident that good with win over evil and a stop to this is in the near future.
In 1973 two things happened:
1. The Endangered Species Act was enacted where animals, trees and scum in rain puddles became protected under law.
2. Roe vs. Wade where 9 mortals, allowed it to be made possible for Humanity to slaughter, burn, aspirate and sever Human Babies, created in God's image and likeness. Since then, humanity, and the USA, spiraled in a downward trend.
Touch a turtle egg or its nest, Canadian goose or a spotted OWL and get a yr. in jail and a $50K fine, and don't cut down certain trees or fill in that puddle! abort a child, get paid $750.00. And we wonder why there is NO respect for HUMAN life created in God's image.
This is why we need to inculcate a culture of life in our society in general and in churches and schools (starting in kindergarten) . People tend to think of children as disposable items.
A pro-life education Program
It's a grievous sin that animals and turtle eggs are afforded more protections and rights than a human fetus and baby created in God's Image with a soul.
Genesis 9:3
Every creature that is alive shall be yours to eat; I give them all to you as I did the green plants.
Man:
Kill the humans (abortion) and save the Bears, the spotted owls, the Canadian Geese and the whales and don't crack that turtle egg!!
You can get fined up to $10,000 for messing with those eggs and baby-killing physicians get paid government and private money $$$ to kill humans! Go figure.
The Endangered Species Act of 1973
The Endangered Species Act of 1973
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973
Penalties and Enforcement
The number of species listed (plants and animals, NOT humans) as threatened or endangered
Species Information
Threatened and Endangered Animals and Plants
10 FALLACIES IN THE ABORTION DEBATE
The Endangered Species Program
Page 4 Sec 3 (c)(8) don't crack those eggs, one might end the "life" of a bird, fish or turtle. I guess certain "mammals" (humans) do not apply.
Science and the ESA
The Govt. recognizes that a fertilized egg from an animal is "alive" and protected by LAW (The Endangered Species Act of 1973) and when an "alive" person created in God's image is growing and living in his mother, he's termed and given the moniker of just a blob of "unlive" protoplasm or tissue which can be aspirated if it's the mother's "choice" to do so with no protections under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.
But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for EVERY careless word they have spoken."--Jesus (Matt. 12:36)
In Florida, women dying in bed have less rights than turtle eggs! (FL Law 370, US ESA of 1973)
Quanta Cura CONDEMNING CURRENT ERRORS
THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS CONDEMNED BY PIUS IX
I. PANTHEISM, NATURALISM AND ABSOLUTE RATIONALISM
sustainable development, euphemism for abortion, population control, control of Sovereign American Land by UN committees, etc. Planning to control populations and trees which lowers the creation of man to the level of a plant or tree in a forest. And people wonder why in 1973 the USA made the destruction of the baby in the womb legal while during the same year enacted the Endangered Species Act which gave federal legal rights and protections to spotted owls, alligators, humpback whales, species of weeds, algae, fish, spiders, brine shrimp, etc. and yet we laugh when these demonic, satanic and pagan UN programs are developed and implemented. In addition, land/property rights happen to be a Holy Institution granted by G-d to humanity through Abraham and Moses; it's nothing to take lightly or jokingly. Firefighters die while fish live.
The Preamble of the UN Earth Charter states:
… we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny. We must join together to bring forth a sustainable global society founded on respect for nature.... Towards this end, it is imperative that we, the peoples of Earth, declare our responsibility to one another, to the greater community of life, and to future generations.
Lies and the Lying Land Grabbers Who Tell Them
UNCED -- United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
AGENDA 21
A major achievement of UNCED was Agenda 21 a thorough and broad-ranging program of actions demanding new ways of investing in our future to reach global sustainable development in the 21st century. Its recommendations ranged from new ways to educate, to new ways to care for natural resources, and new ways to participate in designing a sustainable economy. The overall ambition of Agenda 21 was breathtaking, for its goal was nothing less than to make a safe and just world in which all life has dignity and is celebrated.
Click here for the text of Agenda 21.
Click here for a Press Summary of Agenda21. [ French] [ Spanish ]
Timeline to Global Governance Key players of Millennium Project
HABITAT II – U.N. Housing Requirements
Brainwashing/education Global Governance – key international players
Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Millennium Goals Project Rocky Mountain Institute
Henry Lamb The Sustainable Development Institute
American Policy Center – Tom DeWeese invasive species legislation:
the Wild lands Project, Smart Growth Project
American Farmland Trust & the Nature Conservancy & OSU
Human Settlements – goals ***Education for sustainability: An Agenda Action
United Nations dissolves USA Sovereignty Visioning Training-How To Re-Envision People and Communities People and their organizations and schemes
How to force visioning upon the public as quoted from the United Nation’s Agenda 21 document
World Summit on Sustainable Development
Sustainable development: Erosion of freedom – Part 1
Sustainable development: Erosion of freedom – Part 2
Score One for Bush
A U.N. conference concludes without too much permanent damage.
United States of America: Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List:
Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage
UN and US forest
Land conservancies are gobbling up land all over America
Agenda 21 on Google Search World Heritage Committee
NEW WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CHIEF INVOLVED IN [abortifacient] POPULATION CONTROL VACCINE SCANDAL
POPULATION CONTROL, THE FINAL SOLUTION (1 of 3)
POPULATION CONTROL, THE FINAL SOLUTION (2 of 3)
POPULATION CONTROL, THE FINAL SOLUTION (3 of 3)Role of the United Nations in Population Control
Fantastic, thanks for all the information Coleus!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.