To: Wiz
Then all pieces written by anyone is held for questioning according to your theory, which is asinine/pointless.
8 posted on
02/14/2005 7:30:12 AM PST by
ma bell
("Goddamn it, you'll never get the Purple Heart hiding in a foxhole! Follow me!" - Captain Henry P. ")
To: ma bell
Well, the writer does leave out important little facts, like WW2, and Hitlers aid to the Albanian muslims, who made up the bulk of the SS division under command of Hussaini (Arafats uncle) which slaughtered over 100,000 Serbs, a million Jews,
and destroyed much of the orthadoxy, and was a central proccessing area for all the Jews in Eastern Europe. The Jihadists got their leg up at that time, cancelling all gains from the defeat of the jihadists in 1912.
Now thanks to Clintons blunder, the Serbs may fall for good.Complete genocide.
To: ma bell; Diocletian; DTA
Have I ever said that "all" articles are totally unreliable for the nationality or source? No. Is there any chance it could be unreliable? Not always but likely. What about Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya? What about Canada and France, with strong liberal influence? Serbia was at war with Bosnia years ago and it is likely with strong hatred of Bosnia by the people of Serbia, including the writer of this article.
26 posted on
02/14/2005 8:16:35 PM PST by
Wiz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson