Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Urges Renewal of Patriot Act
ap ^ | 2-14-05 | Nedra Pickler

Posted on 02/14/2005 8:59:15 AM PST by Dan from Michigan

Bush Urges Renewal of Patriot Act

44 minutes ago White House - AP

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) on Monday urged Congress to reauthorize the USA Patriot Act, the Justice Department (news - web sites)'s widely criticized anti-terrorism law.

AP Photo

Reuters Slideshow: President Bush

"We must not allow the passage of time or the illusion of safety to weaken our resolve in this new war" on terrorism, Bush said at a swearing-in ceremony for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales at the Justice Department.

The president also argued that the Senate must give his nominees for the federal bench up-or-down votes without delay to fill vacancies in the courts.

The Patriot Act, passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, bolstered FBI (news - web sites) surveillance and law-enforcement powers in terror cases, increased use of material witness warrants to hold suspects incommunicado for months, and allowed secret proceedings in immigration cases.

Civil liberties groups and privacy advocates lambasted the law because they said it undermines freedom. But Bush said the act "has been vital to our success in tracking terrorists and disrupting their plans." He noted that many key elements of the law are set to expire at the end of the year and said Congress must act quickly to renew it.

The Patriot Act was pushed by Gonzales' predecessor, John Ashcroft (news - web sites), who was in the audience as Gonzales took his oath from Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor (news - web sites). Bush lauded Ashcroft's tireless efforts to make America safer as he oversaw a drop in violent crime besides his counterterrorism work.

Gonzales, who served as White House counsel during the last four years, said he would be a part of Bush's team but his first allegiance will be to the Constitution.

"I am confident that in the days and years ahead we in the department will work together tirelessly to address terrorism and other threats to our nation and to confront injustice with integrity and devotion to our highest ideals," Gonzales said.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: freedomgrabbers; patriotact; unpatriotact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
This law needs to follow the way of the AWB. It needs to be dead and buried.

Especially the judge shopping and sneak and peak provisions.

1 posted on 02/14/2005 8:59:16 AM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Well it should be redebated in the congress and repassed with some of the questionable measures taken out.
2 posted on 02/14/2005 9:01:06 AM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
This law needs to follow the way of the AWB. It needs to be dead and buried.

Question: How many American's rights have been violated because of this law? Please give specific examples. I'd like to research them...

3 posted on 02/14/2005 9:01:21 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

It needs to be renewed, just as it is.


4 posted on 02/14/2005 9:02:45 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Our government is citing an old 1898 measure in order to start taxing Internet connections. No matter what the PATRIOT act should not be made permanent because it could be used for a lot of abuse later on.
5 posted on 02/14/2005 9:04:16 AM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

homeland security needs to have an exit strategy built into it, as well.


6 posted on 02/14/2005 9:04:38 AM PST by the invisib1e hand ("remember, from ashes you came, to ashes you will return.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Another real problem I see with Patriot act (assault on the Constitution notwithstanding) is the follow-on repercussions. If, in 2008, a pinko-commie-nannystate-liberal-whacko ends up in the whitehouse, their enemies will be delivered unto them on a silver platter.

</tinfoil beanie>

LET IT SUNSET!

Top sends


7 posted on 02/14/2005 9:04:42 AM PST by petro45acp (Democrat = socialist. Say it loud, say it often, and VOTE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

That doesn't mean it shouldn't be renewed though.


8 posted on 02/14/2005 9:04:50 AM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Judge shopping is slick trick used to get around locals. Sneak and peak is a violation of the 4th amendment.

So I can name 290,000,000 reasons there. If the law is there, it violates the constitution.

9 posted on 02/14/2005 9:05:00 AM PST by Dan from Michigan (Republican Party Reptile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Made any bank transactions lately, of size say 5k?


10 posted on 02/14/2005 9:05:10 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

I disagree..We are at war.


11 posted on 02/14/2005 9:05:16 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
No matter what the PATRIOT act should not be made permanent because it could be used for a lot of abuse later on.

How? I want to find out more information about the specific loopholes and possible legal implications of making this act permanent.

12 posted on 02/14/2005 9:06:01 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Does anyone here want AG Schumer with this power going after gun groups, cause that's EXACTLY what's going to happen at some point if this is permanent.


13 posted on 02/14/2005 9:06:22 AM PST by Dan from Michigan (Republican Party Reptile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
Made any bank transactions lately, of size say 5k?

Yes, I just did, in fact, this morning...

14 posted on 02/14/2005 9:06:38 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Congress never declared war.


15 posted on 02/14/2005 9:06:44 AM PST by Dan from Michigan (Republican Party Reptile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

So what if we get into a perpetual state of war. How much different is the War on Terror than the War on Drugs? What if we start getting into a war with China? There needs to be some light at the end of the tunnel where we don't need this act or a reduced form of it.


16 posted on 02/14/2005 9:07:12 AM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
But Bush said the act "has been vital to our success in tracking terrorists and disrupting their plans."

I'm trying to find out if it has EVER been successfully used for that purpose.

I think I heard Napolitano say on Fox News a few weeks ago that it has never been used for it's designed purpose. But had been used twice for the WOD.

I'd like to know if I heard that right.

17 posted on 02/14/2005 9:07:41 AM PST by Protagoras (Un-apprehended criminals have no credibility when advocating for the WOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

The Patriot Act, passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, bolstered FBI (news - web sites) surveillance and law-enforcement powers in terror cases, increased use of material witness warrants to hold suspects incommunicado for months, and allowed secret proceedings in immigration cases.

Civil liberties groups and privacy advocates lambasted the law because they said it undermines freedom. But Bush said the act "has been vital to our success in tracking terrorists and disrupting their plans."


18 posted on 02/14/2005 9:07:53 AM PST by Smartaleck (Tom Delay TX: (Dems have no plan, no agenda, no solutions.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Judge shopping is slick trick used to get around locals.

Judge shopping is going on right now. Doesn't every ACLU case seem to find the most available liberal judge in the US for any reason other than terrorism right now?

19 posted on 02/14/2005 9:08:07 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

I know for a fact that it was used in some Vegas case unrelated to terrorism.


20 posted on 02/14/2005 9:08:55 AM PST by Dan from Michigan (Republican Party Reptile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson