LOL... I love this! I think this is the first time I have seen a public exposure of carbon dating. If you didn't know... they have misdated many times and thusly carbon dating is merely a publicly funded joke/fraud. Leftish, I might add. I feel for the folks who see carbon dating as a quasi religion.
"LOL... I love this! I think this is the first time I have seen a public exposure of carbon dating. If you didn't know... they have misdated many times and thusly carbon dating is merely a publicly funded joke/fraud. Leftish, I might add. I feel for the folks who see carbon dating as a quasi religion."
Good point. I also apply this thinking any time some religious figure is discredited thru either sexual perversion (i.e. Catholic priests), scamming televangelists (just about all of 'em), etc. I feel for the folks who see Christianity as a religion.
[/sarcasm
I.E. The actions of one fool don't discredit the proven works of hundreds of others. Also, your post doesn't mention the validity of radioactive dating methods.
I tried carbon dating one time, didn't like it though,
she kept leaving graphite smudges on the sofa.
I heard, not sure this is true, maybe somebody can correct: that, one bad assumption with carbon 14, it assumes the amount of carbon 14 isotopes in the atmosphere today was the same eons ago, it then presumes that the samples that once were living has normal carbon and the carbon 14 that is diffused from the atmosphere, then as the decay proceeds the amount of carbon 14 is reduced, so the ratio of normal to carbon to carbon 14 then determines the age?
But with nobody around to calibrate the atmosphere at the presumed start date then the method is just speculation often used just to bolster somebodies agenda?
YEC INTREP