[orionblamblam]

An archaeologist using the tactics of a Creationist. Pathetic.

[Just mythoughts]

"An archaeologist using the tactics of a Creationist. Pathetic."




Neither can count!

[ColoCdn]

Hard to accept that scientists could be liars, isn't it?

[ColoCdn]

Isn't anybody going to ping PatrickHenry for the Evo list?

[Ahban]

Not sure what you mean about him using "Creationist's tactics". The YECs don't accept c14 dating and the OEC have no reason to manipulate the dates. Can you give some names to your serious accusations, or are simply using the Clintonian defense of attempting to muck up everyone else's reputation because your own man's is mucked up?

The article even paints him a Nazi sympathizer, a natural outgrowth of Darwinian thinking.

The only thing I am curios about is that the 7,500 year old skull fragment that was said to be Neanderthal. Did he fake the identity as well as the date, or where there a few hold outs as recently as 7,500 years? THAT would be a big story.

[Lady Heron]

Oh goody, just one more in a very long list of frauds in the anthropology field. One begins to wonder if they really care about science or has their fanaticism to prove God wrong over taken the need for truth in their "proofs", so that fraud becomes more important than science so that we can change peoples beliefs....no I take that back, I do not have to wonder.

How can anything be believed coming from these "scientist" where truth and facts do not matter but ingraining a lie to prove God wrong does. This field has become a sad joke.