Posted on 02/23/2005 12:49:23 PM PST by Pikamax
the longer Churchill remains tenured and employed, the longer his colleagues protect him... the more clear and inarguable it becomes that American academe NEEDS purging.
And you're not now but rather the poster boy for academic rot.
[I am trying to figure out what motivates white people to condemn their own type?]
The Democratic party is full of self lothing whites like Churchill. It basically stems from guilt. They see the white man as the cause of all of the evil in the world. They beleive that in order to prove to minorities that they are not themselves racist, that they must first denouce their own race. I beleive that the term for this is "aracial".
But at some point, shouldn't self preservation kick in. Or do they think they would somehow be spared any backlash? I guess traitors usually do think that. Funny though, they are usually the first murdered. You'd think they'd catch on--
Yer darned tootin he's a LYING LIAR of LIES! I should know too because I get paid cash for every time I shout it out!
By the way, have you LYING LIARS seen my navel-lint ball hiding around here?
Then see how much "academic freedom" his fellow Marxists would allow him.
The people who vetted, hired, and tenured this obvious crackpot fraud should be purged before he is. The state of Colorado needs to follow up with a full investigation of the CU hiring and tenuring process to see how many other verminous frauds like this are also on the CU faculty and why they are there.
Wonder how The Jersey Girl, Kristen Braithaite, a fellow traveller, feels about her dead husband being called a "little Eichman"?? Does she nod in agreement because they both despise Geprge Bush???
"Hus du gezen in deine leiben, they darker than us. Woof!"
"Is he an Indian? Do we really care?" he said, quoting those he called his "white Republican" critics.
"Let's cut to the chase; I am not," he said.
Anishinabe-wi?
Kawin.
Memwechgwad gaginawishkid.
Is he an Indian?
Nah. Just a liar.
Looks like the reporting was pretty good, they uncovered a purposeful bald faced lie.
Churchill did address the issue of his ethnicity, admitting that he is not Native American.
"Is he an Indian? Do we really care?" he said, quoting those he called his "white Republican" critics.
"Let's cut to the chase; I am not," he said.
His pedigree is "not important," Churchill said: "The issue is the substance of what is said."
Fake.. but accurate.
PRICLESS MAN PRICELESS - it's the new liberal mantra....fake but accurate
this is also priceless, Churchill has just handed the cause for his firing to his employers, what a smuck.....
he clearly was hired because he claimed he was native because his qualifications otherwise would not have cut it if he were not native, as it turns out he wasn't.......
clearly UC was looking for a nice token
Will someone fire this crapweasel already!
He exaggerated his service quite a bit but I've seen articles indicating that he actually was in the Army for, I believe, two years. That's the length of time a draftee would have served in the mid-60's.
While his "White Republican Critics" may not care this "American Indian Republican" is steamed.
I wonder if there is some way to sue him. Defamation of character or something.
Chief Sitting Bullsh*t.
.
Churchill = The not so Great Pretender.
"Let's cut to the chase; I am not," he said. His pedigree is "not important," Churchill said: "The issue is the substance of what is said."
What a propagandist. Don't you love his two-step? He attempts to make the controversy not about him but about a much larger issue, thus diverting attention from his lies and outrageous statements. And even when he admits he's lied (for years!) about his heritage, well, hey, it doesn't matter. We're supposed to pay attention to the substance of what the liar says and ignore his pesky lie. As Churchill would say, in one of his more lucid moments, "Yeah, right."
Check with the ACLU, you have a unique opportunity to put the ACLU into melt down mode, deciding what would be the proper politically correct course of action for them to pursue. I don't know if you could benefit monetarily, but reaction by the ACLU should provide enough humor to last for many years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.