Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Txsleuth

It makes sense because we don't actually need to militarize the borders or anything like that. If we enforce the hundreds of laws already in place, this problem will be gone with in weeeks. Like my teacher said, we have too many laws. Don't need anymore.


15 posted on 02/23/2005 8:17:26 PM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Killborn

For what it is worth, I voted for the option of enforcing the laws already on the books---

I was just remarking that the non-members were voting overwhelmingly to militarize the border, in fact, on the breakdown I saw yesterday, when I voted, the option of enforcing existing laws, had 0% in the non-member section!!!


16 posted on 02/23/2005 8:23:34 PM PST by Txsleuth (Call be anything...just don't call me a fringe poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Killborn
we don't actually need to militarize the borders

As I explained, that's precisely what is needed. I think a ranger force is called for - properly selected, equipped and trained, with a virtual armada of air and ground support. It would also force smugglers, as well, more to the gulf, the coasts and the Canadian border (which basically doesn't exist, either). It certainly would charge the border jumping patterns of foreign nationals.

22 posted on 02/24/2005 5:50:30 AM PST by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson