Churchill misquoted in article on UH speech (did not acknowledge he's not an Indian)

Honolulu Star-Bulletin ^ | 2/24/05

[freespirited]

The Honolulu Star-Bulletin, in an article yesterday, incorrectly quoted University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill as admitting that he was not American Indian.

The story about Churchill's Tuesday night speech at the University of Hawaii-Manoa said the professor noted that his "white Republican" critics were asking, "Is he an Indian? Do we really care?"

"Let's cut to the chase, I'm not," the quote in yesterday's paper continued.

But a review of video and audio tapes of the speech shows that Churchill actually said: "Is he an Indian?

"We really care. We're trying to protect the rights of Indians to divine for themselves, say this circle of flies in the form of white reporters circling a manure pile like it's of all consequential importance.

"Cut to the chase on that."

Churchill went on to say that he is an associate member of the Keetoowah tribe and that associates are enrolled in the band after their genealogy has been vetted by the enrollment office. He said that he is less than one-quarter Indian, so he does not qualify to be a full member.

The issue of whether Churchill has Indian blood is part of the national debate over the controversial professor who gained notoriety for comparing some Sept. 11, 2001, victims to Nazis.

[GOPJ]

Swiss/German is whiter than white.

Churchhill takes a job set aside for a minority, then when discovered wants minorities to stand up for him.

Something like killing your parents and wanting sympathy from the court 'cause you're an orphan.

If I want to steal a minority job, and I can prove I "hate" white people, will the indians play the fool for me?

Churchill is playing 'em all. What a hoot.

[MadIvan]

I just wish he'd change his surname. He isn't fit to have the same family name as dear old Winston.

Regards, Ivan