[liberal] Women Prefer Strong Republican Men (Michele Zip Steps Out Of Closet

Folks, it looks like something finally has happened that might get Bill Clinton to switch parties after this next round of heart surgery that he has. Did you see this little blurb from the editor of Playgirl magazine? Her name is Michele Zip. You didn't see this, Mr. Snerdley? (Laughing.) No, Dawn, you didn't find this, did you? I wondered how this ended up in the stack. Listen to this. "When it comes to sex and politics, Democrats are the more liberal, right? Not so fast. Playgirl editor-in-chief Michele Zipp explores 'down and dirty' politics and examines sexuality on both sides of the aisle. In the process she comes to a realization about herself and reveals for the first time she’s now a Republican."

Now, just stick with me on this, folks. She says, among other things, "The Democrats of the Sixties were all about making love and not war while a war-loving Republican is a man who would fight, bleed, sacrifice, and die for his country. Could you imagine what that very same man would do for his wife in the bedroom? Siding with the GOP when you live in the bluest state around is almost like wearing a Boston Red Sox jersey at a New York Yankees’ home game. I cannot tell you how many times a person assumed I voted for John Kerry in 2004. Most of the time, I don’t have the heart to tell them, or the energy to discuss my reasons for going red this election year. But this is PLAYGIRL magazine so it’s about time I was the one who bared what’s underneath. Those on the right are presumed to be all about power and greed -- two really sexy traits in the bedroom. They want it, they want it now, and they’ll do anything to get it. And I’m not talking about some pansy-assed victory, I’m talking about full on jackpot, satisfaction for all."

So when Clinton gets hold of this, this is the one thing that could make him switch parties. If you ask me, folks -- and I'm a noted expert in this -- it's something everybody's known for years. Women crave men who are willing to fight for their country and fight for what they believe in. How could a member, for example, of the media who produces adult entertainment for women possibly side with conservatives from the red states? How could this woman? She's in the adult entertainment business, she's in the media, how could she side with conservatives? Simple, she says, and spells it out. "Those on the right are presumed to be all about power and greed, two really sexy traits in the bedroom."

So single women, lets not forget this, we got this from the last election, single women tend to vote for Democrats. Now, apparently, according to what I've just read here by Michele Zip this is because they're inexperienced in and out of the bedroom, single women are, and so they don't really know with whom they are dealing. Married women vote Republican. Do they know something that single women don't? When you look at Maureen Dowd and what she writes when she talks about her loneliness and her woe-is-me stuff, when it comes to relationships, it's clear. And you look at the guys that she's been dating, and they are not the horses that Michele Zip points out. So now the Democrats, folks, have another thing to worry about. First they found out the way they used the language is all fouled up. They're all taking crash courses on how to lie better about their positions from that guy out in Berkeley, George Lackoff, rhymes with. Now they need to go out and lie to women to get in better positions, if you take my meaning. Democrats not only need to lie to get elected, they've got to come across as something they're not in the bedroom now in order to really -- what a story. What an absolute story and something I've known all along.

You know, I've been so amazed over the years when feminists have told us that the model of the real man is Alan Alda or Michael Kinsley, and I'm saying, "No, that's not true." It may well be in the feminist circles where you can boss these guys around. They have them on a leash basically, but that's not the country. That's inside the Beltway, and the New York, Boston, liberal corridor. But you get out there in the red states where men are men and women are women, and you find out with whom women have the best time. It's conservative Republicans. And this last line, you just have to love this. "The Democrats of the sixties were all about making love and not war, while a war-loving Republican is a man who would fight, bleed, sacrifice, and die for his country. Could you imagine what that very same man would do for his wife in the bedroom?" This from the editor of Playgirl, Michele Zip.

CALLER: I tuned in kind of late but I was listening to what you were talking about with that Michele Zip article and I wanted to tell you, I have always thought Dick Cheney was the sexiest man alive, and it's because of his power and his confidence, and just he makes me feel safe and secure. I am married, incidentally. I do vote Republican but I just had to call and tell you how much I agree with what you're talking about.

RUSH: Well, thank you, appreciate that, always liked being echoed and supported by people. I knew that I was right. I mean don't misunderstand but I'm happy to hear it from you. She thinks Cheney is one of the sexiest men alive, the left is now, "What about Warren Beatty? What about Richard Dreyfuss?" They're out there shouting, they can't believe this. I just want to warn you out there, Jane, they're going to think you're an absolute nut and wacko. That's going to be their reaction to it. But I mean this babe from Playgirl magazine has laid it out. It's real simple. It all totally makes sense now. Now we know why single women vote Democrat and why married women vote Republican. All the political analysis that went into this and trying to explain it, just go to the bedroom, folks, and that's where the answer lies.

Rush ROCKS...

Source: National Review Online
Published: 10 March 2000 Author: Michael Ledeen
Posted on 03/11/2000 22:42:20 PST by Mudboy Slim

"I spent more than twenty years studying fascism, and all that time I kept asking myself how the democratic countries of the West could have been so blind, and how they could have been so totally unprepared for Hitler's war. After all, he had written Mein Kampf, which pretty much laid it all out. Once in power, he set about arming the country, making menacing sounds to his neighbors, crushing the Jews and separating them out of the population, and preparing to march. It was all so clear. He made no effort to trick us. We simply refused to believe what was right in front of our noses. In the fullness of time, the other Europeans were cannon fodder for Hitler's armies, and the United States did virtually nothing until we were bombed into war by the Japanese.

Then I look at China today, and I ask myself the same questions. China's leaders have made no bones about their hatred for us. They have loudly and publicly announced their intention to develop armies capable of destroying us. They have threatened to bomb Los Angeles if we do anything to annoy them, especially in the defense of democratic Taiwan. They have been busily crushing religious groups in China who dare recognize any authority other than the regime itself, and are separating them out of the population. There is no effort to trick us, none of the legendary inscrutability of the East. It is all so clear.

In the past few days, both the CIA and the FBI have warned about the increasing Chinese espionage in the United States, aimed primarily at obtaining our advanced military technology. One wonders why they bother, since we've been quite willing to sell them most anything they need. Clinton and Gore have deliberately and systematically armed China, and when a tiny handful of congressmen tried to get the details, Clinton and Gore quashed investigations and withheld evidence from investigators.

Meanwhile, the Chinese prepare for war, and warn us of its consequences. The headlines for the past several weeks have reported an endless barrage of threats from Beijing: There will be war with Taiwan if it dares to act as an independent country, and war with us if we dare to defend them, as we have sometimes promised to do. It may be all bluff and bluster, but, I keep thinking, that's what lots of people said about Hitler.

The Taiwanese elections are now ten days away, and the Chinese show all the signs of preparing to attack. They have moved an enormous quantity of military materiel down south, just across the straits from Taiwan. They have hordes and swarms of soldiers, bundles of missiles, plenty of aircraft. The intelligence community reports these facts to our leaders, but our leaders are silent. Great journalists like Bill Gertz report these facts to the public, but there is no outcry. We are strong enough to deter China, but we show no sign of wanting to warn them off. On the contrary: we welcome their military leaders, escort them around our bases, sell them our best weapons, and even train their soldiers. Not even the most feckless French leaders would have dreamed of training the Wehrmacht, or of selling advanced technology for the Panzer corps.

Whether now or a few years from now, it is increasingly likely that we will have to fight China, and we have done everything possible to ensure that they will win. In the 1930s, Western businessmen did deals with the Nazis, but there was no leading Western government that armed the Third Reich as a matter of official policy. But we are arming China. Clinton and Gore are Lenin's dream come true: capitalists selling communists the rope with which to hang us.

Some legacy."

MUD: Bill Clinton has sold out this Country's security in a devil's pact to remain in power. At this point, he couldn't stand up to the Chi-Coms even if he were so inclined, because they would leak such compellingly concrete evidence of his treasonous, anti-American activities that even the Clinton Sycophants in the Vast, Left-Wing Media Whore'd would have to sit up and take notice!! Algore is similarly compromised and cannot be trusted to act in the best interests of the United States in matters relating to China. For all you folks who think there is no difference between the DemonRATS and Republicans, please watch this issue carefully over the next eight months...we cannot afford another four-to-eight years of Clinton/Gore policies as they relate to China. And for you BushBackers out there, please make every effort to impress upon Dubyuh the absolute necessity of making ChinaGate an integral issue in the upcoming presidential campaign.

FReegards...MUD

1 Posted on 03/11/2000 22:42:20 PST by Mudboy Slim (Treason.is@Capital.Crime)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.