Posted on 03/14/2005 12:16:45 PM PST by Dont Mention the War
Nobody is born with the fetish of homosexual behivior
The law has NEVER had a love test for marriage.
The homosexual relationships are only about recreational sex. Nothing else. Homosexuality is irrelevent to society, it serves no function other than individual sexual gratification.
Marriage is about the future of society. Homosexual have no future other than recruitment.
I don't know if Kramer is a republican but republican governor Pete Wilson (1991-1999) appointed him in December 1996. I have also heard that Kramer is supposedly a Catholic. As a Catholic myself, I would have either decided the case in the opposite or recused myself. If he is a Catholic he is a lost Catholic in my opinion.
I wonder if there is such a think as a CINO? Catholic in name only. (ala RINO)
Actually religion would have nothing to do with this. The law alone is dead agains what this judge did. I think a little digging will reveal this judge to be an adherent to the ABA model divorce code which has included homosexual marriage.
You are right, they dress it up and call what they want but it is still unnatural and sick.
The law has no love test. This judge has basically provided a recreational sex test. If two men or two women want to manipulate each other's genitals then they now have sufficient standing to be married. No children or even a hint of producing children from the sexual relations, just soddomy.
Which explains why homosexuals are propagandizing their effort as feeeeeeelings and looooooooooove. Legal hogwash.
Any lawyer who argues that with a straight face should have his or her license revoked.
LOL -yes there are. Kerry & Kennedy are two examples. They tend to be liberal in politics and or doctrine and are also called cafeteria Catholics.
off topic:
I know that you are quite interested in matters involving the ABA model divorce code; I don't know if you are aware of this but what do you think of this pending Catholic challenge to convention that cites Church teaching and acceptance of Catholic doctrine regarding marriage as a defacto prenuptial agreement. From Mary's Advocates - Defending Families Against Forced No-Fault Divorce?
Now that's a great idea......never thought of it. It sure would be helpful for those that do care for elderly parents or siblings.
Absolutely. Come up to Canada, namely the province of Quebec. 90% of the population claims to be 'Catholic', but the political and cultural trends do NOT back that up:
-75% support gay marriage there (versus 35% in the rest of Canada
-Over 70% support abortion there
-Church attendance lower than anywhere else in the Western world
-The US is overall hated there (as well, 40% there believe there should be NO military)
-More common-law relationships than anywhere else in North America - by far
LOL -depraved colon exploration provides insight into the meaning of love?
No one can read your mind, Dreadful. Do you see gay people as being any different from straight people?
Do you believe that being gay is about as significant as, say, being from Arizona?
Gays are different, Dreadful. That's why they have a scientific name and colloquial names, ie gay, to define them differently from straight people, right, Dreadful?
It's not "who" you are that matters here, it's "what" you are. And you can't help that, nor can you change the definition and what it stands for.
Civil rights legislation has allowed gays to have the openness they never had before. Gays may openly operate in our society as equals and without shame or (mostly) ill will. That is a terrific improvement, and exactly due to the gay movement.
But being equal doesn't mean you're the same. You never will be the same. You know that. And it's that immutable difference that will keep gays outside the institution of marriage, probably forever.
Work for viable civil unions. Call yourselves "Life Partners" or something, wear the signifying rings, etc.
You'll be respected that way every bit as much as you are now (except for the marriage activism stuff, which causes resentment), you WILL be "equal" to married people. You just won't be the same.
You aren't, you know.
bump to respond later
Tell me where in the above sentence it says anything about reading your mind. If you are offended by the truth that is your problem.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.