But per So Cal Rocket's synopsis, the judge starts out using a rational basis test, suggesting that the law does not have a rational relationship to a legitimate state purpose. Then he jumps to a denial of equal protection, which would call for strict scrutiny.
Since when is being a homosexual a suspect category?
One more time J. Kramer: you guys in the gowns interpret the laws, while the guys/gals in suits make them.
(Let's hoist them, whaddya say? "We are a notion of laws, not men." US v. Nixon, 1974)
notion=nation