Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former WorldCom CEO Guilty on All Counts
Yahoo ^ | March 15, 2005

Posted on 03/15/2005 2:35:44 PM PST by traumer

Jury Finds Ex-WorldCom CEO Bernard Ebbers Guilty on All Counts in Connection With Massive Fraud

NEW YORK (AP) -- Bernard Ebbers, the once-swaggering CEO of WorldCom, was convicted Tuesday of engineering the largest corporate fraud in U.S. history -- an $11 billion accounting scandal that capsized the big telecom company three years ago.

The verdict marked a colossal fall for Ebbers, who had turned a humble Mississippi long-distance provider into a global telecommunications power, swallowing up companies along the way and earning the nickname "Telecom Cowboy."

A federal jury in Manhattan returned guilty verdicts on all nine counts, including securities fraud, conspiracy and lying to regulators -- a decision that could send Ebbers, 63, to prison for the rest of his life. Sentencing was set for June 13.

The former chief executive reddened deeply when the jury announced its verdict after eight days of deliberations, and his wife, Kristie, burst into tears in the courtroom's front row. Later, as his lawyer spoke outside, promising an appeal, Ebbers and his wife -- nearly toppled by the enormous crew of cameras and reporters camped outside the federal courthouse -- made their way to a nearby street, hailed a cab and drove away.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales called the conviction a "triumph of our legal system." He said the jury had recognized that the fraud "extended from the middle management levels of this company all the way to its top executive."

In a six-week trial, prosecutors painted Ebbers as obsessed with keeping WorldCom stock high, and panicked about pressure he was getting over $400 million in personal loans that were backed by his own WorldCom shares.

From late 2000 to mid-2002, the government claimed, Ebbers intimidated chief financial officer Scott Sullivan into covering up billions of dollars in out-of-control expenses and recognizing improper revenue.

"He was WorldCom, and WorldCom was Ebbers," prosecutor William Johnson told jurors. "He built the company. He ran it. Of course he directed this fraud."

The defense claimed all along that the fraud was masterminded by Sullivan, who testified as the star government witness that Ebbers instructed him quarter after quarter to "hit our numbers" -- meet Wall Street expectations.

Ebbers himself took the witness stand at trial's end and flatly denied any role in the fraud. He said he viewed his role at the company as a visionary and cheerleader, was uncomfortable with accounting and left it to Sullivan.

"He's never told me he made an (accounting) entry that wasn't right," Ebbers said of Sullivan. "If he had, we wouldn't be here today."

The largely blue-collar jury of seven women and five men considered the case for eight days, an uncommonly long deliberation for white-collar cases, but never showed signs of discord.

The jurors were ushered away from the courthouse without speaking to the media, and Judge Barbara Jones instructed reporters not to badger them.

Outside court, top defense lawyer Reid Weingarten said he was "devastated" but predicted Ebbers "will ultimately be vindicated" on appeal. He said he had no regrets about calling Ebbers to testify.

"I did not think Mr. Ebbers ever acted with criminal intent," he said. "Obviously we're disappointed by the result, but the fight will continue."

Legal experts said the appeal would be difficult. Weingarten said part of the case would center on prosecutors' refusal to grant immunity to three former WorldCom executives the defense wanted to call as witnesses.

The nine criminal counts against Ebbers -- securities fraud, conspiracy and seven counts of making false filings to the Securities and Exchange Commission -- carry up to 85 years in prison. He will be free on bail until sentencing.

The conviction comes more than two years after an internal auditor began asking questions about curious accounting at WorldCom, touching off a scandal that eventually unearthed $11 billion in cooked books.

With the entire telecom industry suffering a dot-com hangover, the fraud was driven by soaring "line costs" -- the fees WorldCom paid to smaller local telephone carriers to use their networks.

Besides Sullivan, three former WorldCom accounting officials who have pleaded guilty in the case testified they were pressured to cover up the expenses. Only Sullivan directly implicated Ebbers.

Ebbers still faces civil litigation, including from the company, which backed up his $400 million in personal loans when Bank of America demanded more and more collateral as the stock price fell.

The company struck a $750 million settlement with federal regulators to repay aggrieved investors, a small sum compared to the tens of billions of dollars of market capitalization that evaporated in the scandal.

WorldCom, which was based in Clinton, Miss., since re-emerged as MCI Inc., based in Ashburn, Va.

Twelve former directors of the company, plus some investment banks that underwrote WorldCom securities and auditing firm Arthur Andersen, also face a civil trial brought by angry investors. That trial is scheduled to get under way later this month.

In winning a conviction against Ebbers, federal prosecutors in Manhattan rang up another victory in a remarkable string of white-collar prosecutions that began in the summer of 2002.

Martha Stewart, Adelphia Communications founder John Rigas and former dot-com banking star Frank Quattrone were all found guilty during that stretch -- with the same prosecutor, David Anders, handling both Quattrone and Ebbers.

The prosecutors have also wrung guilty pleas from countless other executives, including ImClone Systems Inc. founder Sam Waksal and five other former WorldCom officials who agreed to cooperate against Ebbers.

Sullivan and the three former WorldCom executives who have pleaded guilty in the case still face sentencing. They hope to win lighter prison terms -- or none at all -- by cooperating with the government against Ebbers.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ebbers; worldcom

1 posted on 03/15/2005 2:35:45 PM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traumer

Can have Martha's bunkbed..... it's still warm :o)


2 posted on 03/15/2005 2:36:39 PM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

wasn't he the church-going baptist, sunday school teacher, beloved wealth-giver to the mississippi town?


3 posted on 03/15/2005 2:39:14 PM PST by ken21 ( today's luxury development. tomorrow's slum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Wish I could be on the jury during penalty phase.


4 posted on 03/15/2005 2:40:59 PM PST by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

How is this possible?!? I thought he was buddy-buddy with Bush! How could Dubya let this happen? Was Bernie's campaign contribution a day late and a dollar short?
What's the use in having a Republican president if he can't even fulfil his primary duty of protecting Big Corporations? Geez is there nobody you can trust these days?


5 posted on 03/15/2005 2:42:37 PM PST by Ostlandr (Ich liebe alles der Juden und Schwarzen. Ich hast alles der Weissenvolk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer
"Bernard Ebbers, the once-swaggering CEO of WorldCom, was convicted Tuesday of engineering the largest corporate fraud in U.S. history -- an $11 billion accounting scandal that capsized the big telecom company three years ago."

But because there was no way to link Ebbers to Bush or Republicans, this "largest corporate fraud in U.S. history" has received 1/500th the publicity of the Enron scandal, and 1/300th the publicity accorded to disputes about Halliburton's billing practices and no-bid contracts.
6 posted on 03/15/2005 2:42:38 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

These guys all live fast and play hard. If they broke the rules, they should pay and pay and pay. It wouldn't hurt the corporate types to have to answer from time to time, IMHO.


7 posted on 03/15/2005 2:45:51 PM PST by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr
"I thought he was buddy-buddy with Bush!"

I never heard that; I thought he had some ties with some Clinton people, but none with Bush. It seems to me if there had been a Bush connection, we would have heard about it endlessly, as we did with Ken Lay, even though Lay and Bush were only casual acquaintances, not close "buddies" as the press always put it.
8 posted on 03/15/2005 2:45:57 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: traumer

New liberal bumper sticker: Bush Lied, Ebbers Fried


9 posted on 03/15/2005 2:46:41 PM PST by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Couldn't happen to a "nicer" guy. He played fast and loose with the rules. Always willing to step on the "little guy" because he had Gates envy.

Well, soon, he will get his dues but that is little consolation to the millions who lost their pensions betting (not investing) on his "leadership".

He should hang!


10 posted on 03/15/2005 2:50:48 PM PST by Prost1 (New AG, Berger still free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
But because there was no way to link Ebbers to Bush or Republicans, this "largest corporate fraud in U.S. history" has received 1/500th the publicity of the Enron scandal, and 1/300th the publicity accorded to disputes about Halliburton's billing practices and no-bid contracts.

Ah, another Seattle liberal Bush hating DemocRAT comes forth!

11 posted on 03/15/2005 3:25:21 PM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: teletech
"Ah, another Seattle liberal Bush hating DemocRAT comes forth!"

If you saw my comment as Bush-hating, either I didn't express myself very well or you didn't read very closely. My point was directed against Democrats and media who have underplayed the WorldCom scandal because they couldn't make any remote connection between WorldCom and Bush. Halliburton did have no-bid contracts, and there have been disputes about their billing practices, neither of which - in my opinion - means that there was anything illegal going on or that the Bush administration did anything wrong. But because of Cheney's former ties with Halliburton, and because Bush knew Ken Lay, the media/Dems have tried to paint the Enron scandal as a Bush scandal, and have tried to treat the Halliburton situation as a scandal, when there is in fact no scandal. By contrast, the media's coverage of the WorldCom scandal has been very low key; the man in the street has heard all about Enron and Halliburton, but little about WorldCom. Why? Because WorldCom provided no way, however far-fetched, to attack Bush. That was my point.
12 posted on 03/15/2005 3:41:15 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
If you saw my comment as Bush-hating, either I didn't express myself very well or you didn't read very closely. My point was directed against Democrats and media who have underplayed the WorldCom scandal because they couldn't make any remote connection between WorldCom and Bush. Halliburton did have no-bid contracts, and there have been disputes about their billing practices, neither of which - in my opinion - means that there was anything illegal going on or that the Bush administration did anything wrong. But because of Cheney's former ties with Halliburton, and because Bush knew Ken Lay, the media/Dems have tried to paint the Enron scandal as a Bush scandal, and have tried to treat the Halliburton situation as a scandal, when there is in fact no scandal. By contrast, the media's coverage of the WorldCom scandal has been very low key; the man in the street has heard all about Enron and Halliburton, but little about WorldCom. Why? Because WorldCom provided no way, however far-fetched, to attack Bush. That was my point.

You're absolutely right. I misread you COMPLETELY. Please accept my apology.

13 posted on 03/15/2005 3:46:20 PM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson