Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: socal_parrot; ambrose
I think this whole situation shows the need for some sort of directive for next-of-kin (not just spouse),

Spouses shouldn't trump parents? Where does it end?

Anyway, consider if one is pro-Life, how can one sign this pro-choice document? Why should it matter if Terri said she didn't want to be sustained verbally or in writing?

3 posted on 03/21/2005 10:35:47 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Shermy

If it is in writing, and properly executed, there is no reason to doubt it would be upheld.

Then the only challenge would be to show the document is a fake or had been surperceeded by another document (like a new will over an old will)


4 posted on 03/21/2005 10:39:09 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Shermy

My point was that in the Scaivo case, there is no living will so the courts are going with the spouse's wishes. If she would have done a directive things would be more clear.


8 posted on 03/21/2005 10:43:49 AM PST by socal_parrot (Das Leben besteht nicht nur aus Vergnuegen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Shermy

You have no understanding of the abortion debate if you confuse apples and oranges. A living will is executed by an adult for themselves to let others know what they want.

In the present debate the mother and father would have a different view if there was a document which said "do this". Same for the judge.

Now we only have a heresay exception statement which was admitted and considered.


9 posted on 03/21/2005 10:44:07 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson