Spouses shouldn't trump parents? Where does it end?
Anyway, consider if one is pro-Life, how can one sign this pro-choice document? Why should it matter if Terri said she didn't want to be sustained verbally or in writing?
If it is in writing, and properly executed, there is no reason to doubt it would be upheld.
Then the only challenge would be to show the document is a fake or had been surperceeded by another document (like a new will over an old will)
My point was that in the Scaivo case, there is no living will so the courts are going with the spouse's wishes. If she would have done a directive things would be more clear.
You have no understanding of the abortion debate if you confuse apples and oranges. A living will is executed by an adult for themselves to let others know what they want.
In the present debate the mother and father would have a different view if there was a document which said "do this". Same for the judge.
Now we only have a heresay exception statement which was admitted and considered.