Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa

I think you misunderstood. The association is for the ban. The ban would drive moms & pops out of business. Big chains would benefit.


12 posted on 03/23/2005 4:53:34 AM PST by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: whereasandsoforth
The association is for the ban. The ban would drive moms & pops out of business. Big chains would benefit.

That is EXACTLY what is going on here. The restaurant associations are, for the most part, controlled by the chains. As a rule they can handle a downward turn in business because they know their competition can't withstand it.......in a short period of time the chains will be the only games left in town.

Smoker bans are government sanctioned monompoly deals for the chain restaurants.

16 posted on 03/23/2005 5:01:24 AM PST by Gabz (Wanna join my tag team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: whereasandsoforth
I think you misunderstood. The association is for the ban. The ban would drive moms & pops out of business. Big chains would benefit.

This is how capitalism works. Survival of the fitest.

22 posted on 03/23/2005 5:22:30 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson