[Bombardier]

If nothing else, the immigration/borders issue will be brought into the open, which is a very good thing. Some will try to label Tancredo as being a "Buchananite," but there's one difference: Tancredo's positions are usually well thought out, and not moonbat material, the way Pat's are when he's off his meds. Does he stand a chance of gaining the nomination? As good a chance as anyone at this point, to be honest....and if we can keep our heads about us, we might actually be able to discuss immigration/borders in an intelligent fashion which would (I think) hurt the Dems.

Go for it, Tom! You'll make it interesting, at least!

[Sonny M]

Some will try to label Tancredo as being a "Buchananite," but there's one difference: Tancredo's positions are usually well thought out, and not moonbat material, the way Pat's are when he's off his meds.

I was always given the impression that the only difference between Tancredo and other conservatives is he's more strong on anti-immigration then everyone else, but other wise, all of his views are textbook mainstream conservative, i.e. lower taxes, free trade, reduce spending, and none of the populist economics.

Is that the case, because then, he could, on the minimum pull the election to the right, if still not be viable (I just don't think congressmen can get elected president in this day and age).

[Finalapproach29er]

Buchanan was talking about this in 1991-92, yet you put him down despite his prescience.

[moehoward]

BUMP THAT!