WSJ: Catching a 'Curveball'

Wall Street Journal ^ | April 12, 2005 | Editorial

[OESY]

...[M]ore than 10 days after the bipartisan Robb-Silberman Commission debunked a major piece of the media's Iraq war narrative -- that Ahmed Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress played a major role in the bad intelligence on Saddam's WMDs -- almost none of the outlets that sold the story have seen fit to correct the record or explain their reporting.

An honorable exception is NBC's Tim Russert, who in any case appears to have been guilty of nothing more that believing what he read in places like the Los Angeles Times and Newsweek. On Sunday's edition of "Meet the Press," Mr. Russert acknowledged having repeated the story and confronted Jay Rockefeller with the Commission's (and the CIA's) finding of no evidence linking a lying Iraqi defector code named "Curveball" to the INC:

Mr. Russert: "But, in fact, for the record, there's no evidence that Mr. Chalabi was associated with Curveball."

Senator Rockefeller: "Chalabi's footprints are all over virtually everything. I mean, where you have defectors, where you have, as Curveball was called, a fabricator, you're likely to find somewhere Chalabi's footprint."

Mr. Russert: "But the report says there was no direct involvement with Curveball or linkage to...."

Mr. Russert then went on to read from a recent editorial of ours, in which we noted the Commission's finding that "INC-related sources had a minimal impact on pre-war assessments." As for Curveball, Mr. Russert said, "If there's no connection, it should be so stated."

At which point Senator Rockefeller added the name of Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith to his rant, repeating still more phony allegations that have been undercut by both the Robb-Silberman findings and an earlier report by the Senate Intelligence Committee on which Mr. Rockefeller sits. Kudos to Mr. Russert, but whoever is doing Mr. Rockefeller's staff work is overpaid.

[Obadiah]

Excellent editorial.