Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Sees Mrs. Clinton as Presidential Nominee in 2008
NY TIMES ONLINE.COM ^ | APRIL 14, 2005 | KATHARINE Q. SEELYE

Posted on 04/13/2005 9:11:29 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich said Tuesday that he thought Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Democrat of New York, would be her party's presidential nominee in 2008 and that she would be "very formidable." He said she might even win.

Mr. Gingrich, a Republican, was addressing the American Society of Newspaper Editors here and was asked if he might challenge her for president in 2008. He did not answer that question, but it was clear he had been watching her.

"Senator Clinton is very competent, very professional, very intelligently moving toward the center, very shrewdly and effectively serving on the Armed Services Committee - the first New Yorker to serve on the modern Armed Services Committee since it was created in 1948," he said.

"And I think any Republican who thinks she's going to be easy to beat has a total amnesia about the history of the Clintons," Mr. Gingrich said, pairing her with her husband, former President Bill Clinton.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: americansociety; editors; election2008; hillary; hillary2008; hillaryclinton; newtgingrich; ofnewspaper; speech

1 posted on 04/13/2005 9:11:32 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: CHARLITE

Whichever party owns the moderates will win in 2008. Not the party who tries to defeat their own moderates.


3 posted on 04/13/2005 10:26:53 PM PDT by tkathy (Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Who cares? Clinton, Kennedy, Pelosi, Boxer. Sameo sameo.


4 posted on 04/13/2005 10:30:23 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptbarnum1984
"I think Hillary will win."

Maybe, if John False Kerry (and other Democrat candidates) beat her up pretty badly in a rough, "winner-take-all" primary, she won't look so hot coming out of the fray.


"We're going to take things away from you, for the common good."


5 posted on 04/13/2005 10:49:50 PM PDT by CHARLITE (Women are powerful; freedom is beautiful.........and STUPID IS FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

A true portrait--the bottom picture best captures all her class and dignity.

If the Republicans don't shore up Frist and support DeLay, we may be in trouble. Meantime, we all have to do our best to speak to at least one lib day and give pause for thought.--which assumes we know one a day capable of thought.

vaudine


6 posted on 04/13/2005 11:27:58 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; All
HILL EYES BOXER'S LEFT HOOK (Repubs savor new video of shrill Hil raging about "extremism")

http://www.c-span.org/

Click back through about five pages of video archives and you'll find a RealPlayer link. It's listed for 10 April.

7 posted on 04/14/2005 4:14:42 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Newt wants the nomination, but he's not it. He's too tainted by what he did to his wife. At times, he's a great, visionary thinker. But sometimes he lacks common political sense.

Whoever we nominate vs. She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named will have to make immigration control the #1 issue, then he or she will be a shoe-in, because that issue speaks to the economy and terrorism, and, indirectly, to SS reform.

8 posted on 04/14/2005 5:28:22 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Whichever party owns the moderates will win in 2008.

Al Gore won moderates by 8 points in 2000. John Kerry won moderates by 9 points in 2004. Neither became President. The Republicans don't have to cave in to the moderates to win. They just have to hold the Democratic advantage under double digits. (Bill Clinton won moderates by 17 and 24 points, respectively).

9 posted on 04/14/2005 1:00:19 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor

Depends entirely on the definition of moderates. Each side probably has their own definition.


10 posted on 04/14/2005 1:24:52 PM PDT by tkathy (Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor

Depends entirely on the definition of moderates. Each side probably has their own definition.


11 posted on 04/14/2005 1:24:59 PM PDT by tkathy (Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

The numbers I used were for those who self-identify as moderates, when given the choice between identifying themselves as conservative, liberal or moderate.


12 posted on 04/14/2005 1:33:58 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson