Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lovely.. now we have the courts defining what "hunting" means.

Calling all hunters!

The main reason to be concerned about this is that it has never been done before, and will set a precident.

1 posted on 04/14/2005 9:09:01 AM PDT by Dubya-M-Dees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dubya-M-Dees
In order to humanely hunt with a gun, you have to practice with a gun under the conditions of a hunt.

Sporting clays are meant to simulate the hunting conditions of upland game.

2 posted on 04/14/2005 9:12:16 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dubya-M-Dees

now the beetch when the have tose pigeon shoots too, for practic (cough cough) which is it?


3 posted on 04/14/2005 9:27:11 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dubya-M-Dees

Uh. They are shooting at clay targets. This is not a hunting issue, it's a gun issue. If the proponents of this ban are serious about opposition to hunting, they should PROMOTE shooting at clay instead of live critters.


5 posted on 04/14/2005 9:49:21 AM PDT by followerofchrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dubya-M-Dees

Judge will hear case testing hunting rights
Company says shooting at clay targets qualifies in its challenge to Nelson's denial of permit

BY CARLOS SANTOS
TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER Apr 14, 2005


LOVINGSTON -- A Nelson County judge refused yesterday to dismiss a lawsuit claiming the county had violated hunters' constitutional right to hunt.


The lawsuit is being followed closely by hunters across the nation.

Orion Sporting Group LLC claimed the Board of Supervisors violated Orion's rights to hunt under the Virginia Constitution by denying a special-use permit to operate a shotgun sports center where customers shoot at clay targets that simulate game.

The county argues that hunting can only be defined as the pursuit of live animals and sought the suit's dismissal yesterday.

Circuit Judge Michael J. Gamble said he needed to see more evidence at the trial scheduled for next week.

"We have to determine what actions at Orion do consist of hunting beyond the pursuit of game," Gamble said.

But Gamble heard lively and sometimes eloquent arguments over just what constitutes hunting before he decided to proceed with the trial.

John W. Zunka, a lawyer for the supervisors, argued that shooting at clay targets is simply not hunting and so is not a constitutionally protected right.

Zunka argued that the definition of the word "hunt" is "unambiguous. Hunting involves the pursuit of live animals or game. Hunting is a very plain and unambiguous word . . . and hunting is not shooting sporting clays."

Stephen P. Halbrook, a lawyer for Orion, argued that shooting at sporting clays -- small round targets that are thrown into the air is an integral part of hunting.

"It's our position that hunting includes a number of activities necessary for pursuing live game. . . . Shooting clays is a part of hunting.

"If there's a right to hunt, there should be a right to be proficient, to be safe and to be humane," all of which are goals that can be improved by the practice of shooting clays, Halbrook said.

Orion has portrayed the lawsuit as a stand for the state's constitutional right to hunt and said that the decision in the lawsuit will have an enormous impact on hunters in Virginia as well as in other states with similar constitutional rights.

The controversy between the county and Orion has also ignited a national debate -- in columns and news stories in sporting and gun magazines -- over what constitutes hunting.

In 2000, voters approved an amendment to the Virginia Constitution that declares "the people have a right to hunt, fish, and harvest game, subject to such regulations and restrictions as the General Assembly may prescribe by general law."

"Hunting is not just pulling the trigger and shooting the animal," said Halbrook, who noted that in the state's constitution, the word "hunt' and "harvest game" are separate rights. "Harvesting game means something different than hunting."

Early last year, the county denied Orion a permit to operate the shotgun sports center as part of its licensed hunting preserve, based on noise and safety issues. The center would have been situated within a 450-acre tract near Wingina in southern Nelson County.

"I guess the issue will be decided at trial," Zunka said after the hearing. "We have a novel issue here."

Halbrook said he will call more than a dozen witnesses, some of them experts on hunting, to prove that hunting includes a wide variety of protected activities, including shooting clays.

"There's no case law on this," Halbrook said. "This is the first big case. We think it will set the tone."


Contact Carlos Santos at (434) 295-9542 or csantos@timesdispatch.com


9 posted on 04/16/2005 12:00:39 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to report every illegal alien that you meet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson