Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AUCTIONED HOST TAKEN OFF EBAY AND HANDED OVER TO DIOCESE
Spirit Daily ^ | April 16, 2005 | Mike Brown

Posted on 04/16/2005 9:03:04 AM PDT by NYer

We are pleased to report that the sale of what was purported to be a Host consecrated by Pope John Paul II and put up for sale on eBay, the on-line auctioneer, has been withdrawn, with the Host handed over to the Diocese of Sioux City, Iowa, where the seller is located [see previous story].

The issue garnered national media attention when, within minutes of a link to it on this website Wednesday night,, a Cupertino, California, man offered $2,000 for the Host to keep it out of the hands of witches, satanists, or souvenir hunters.

Although eBay claimed it received "a few" protests, the California man told us that he received 500 e-mails in just the several hours his address was displayed on Spirit Daily, before he asked us to remove his name, preferring anonymity.

Earlier Friday, Monsignor Roger J. Augustine, administrator of the Diocese of Sioux City, met with the seller and was advised that the sale would not be consummated.  According to Msgr. Augustine, the seller deeply regretted the effort to sell the Eucharist and extended a personal apology to him, the diocese and any others who had been offended by the eBay listing.  Because the transaction never materialized, there was no money exchanged or received.

"The Eucharist detailed in the eBay auction was given to Msgr. Augustine and has been properly disposed of according to the dictates of Catholic Church law," states a diocesan press release. "'As I said earlier this week, the Eucharist represents the true presence of Jesus Christ to Catholics,' said Msgr. Augustine.  'I am most grateful that the seller agreed that it was in everyone's best interest to bring this issue to a positive conclusion.'"

Continues the press release: "The issue of the attempted sale of the Eucharist has attracted both national and international attention with e-mails and fax messages coming into the diocesan office from countless communities. Although this specific issue has been resolved, the diocese still has differences with eBay and its policy governing the listing of items that are offensive to people of faith.  E-Bay officials contend they see nothing offensive with the sale of such items on their website. Many Catholic organizations and individuals have taken issue with that policy and apparently are making their opinions known to eBay officials."

Meanwhile, the man who purchased the Host, a member of the Knights of Columbus, told us that he is more than pleased with the outcome. "I'm overwhelmed with the silent majority and how they spoke up and took action in this case," he told us, referring to the many who voiced outrage [see secular report].

There were two bids before he placed his $2,000 offer, one for $120 and one for $150.

"I am not a Catholic and do not believe I'm going to hell for selling this collectible," said the owner in his original advertisement. "It's a memento from that great afternoon with Pope John Paul II. Yes, this is the actual Eucharist I saved during the Mass that I participated in on October 18th, 1998. I ate one wafer then I went back and got another one to save and he gave me another one, but I did get a very dirty look! I was studying in Florence that semester and a bunch of us went down to Rome that week to partake. I'm not Catholic, but I found it all very interesting. Along with the Eucharist, I have the program from that day and a little bulletin. It's all in Italian. I also have four stamps from the Vatican that year and a bottle opener that I bought when I was in Rome way back in 1992. From what I understand, if you're holding something in your hand during a certain moment when Pope John Paul II spoke during his Mass, it becomes blessed. I was holding this bottle opener during Mass with him in 1992. It has his picture on one side and a picture of the Trevi Fountain on the other."

The seller went on to explain that everything from 1998 (Eucharist, bulletin, program, and stamps) were encased in plastic in his "scratch book" and all were in "awesome condition." Photos authenticating his presence there that day were also to be included (although we cannot verify any of his claims).


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: ebay; eucharist; freepbay; host; jpii; monsignor; pope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-200 next last
To: rwfromkansas
Maybe I will walk up to my local Catholic church and take part.

It isn't like they are going to know I am Protestant.

What are they going to do, throw me out?

Well, you could always receive communion while pretending to be a Catholic.

But, if you made a point of making known where you stood on the matter and then got in to communion line anyway, I would expect the priest to simply deny it to you.

What are you going to do then?

If you answer involves anything to the affect of forcing yourself physically or disrupting the mass... you'd be out on your ass before you knew what hit you.

161 posted on 04/17/2005 1:07:51 PM PDT by Barnacle (Be not afraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: RansomOttawa
"Idolatry"? Why? Who in a Protestant church is worshiping a chunk of bread and shot-glass of grape juice?

Ugh.
162 posted on 04/17/2005 1:20:02 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

My Missal mentions only four groups allowed to receive Communion: Catholics (of course), The Orthodox, The Polish National Catholic Church, and the Assyrian Church of the East. Now whether they let their members receive our Eucharist, that is another matter.


163 posted on 04/17/2005 1:21:25 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
I am a believer in Jesus Christ. I have a right to communion, even though when I arrive, I will know your version to be incorrect Biblically

Why would you think you have such a right? Do you also believe you have the right to be married to another non-Catholic in a Catholic Church too?

Also, why would you even want to receive it in a Catholic Church, since doing so implies an endorsement of Catholic doctrine on the Real Presence.
164 posted on 04/17/2005 1:25:05 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
It makes no sense for Jesus to have literally meant it was his body and blood.

So now you're able to divine Christ's intent?

The dangers of DIY Sola Scripturism.
165 posted on 04/17/2005 1:29:57 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
It was Peter's confession upon which the church was built, not Peter. "upon this rock I will build my church." Not "upon him I will build this church." Scripture refers to Jesus as the rock and a firm faith as being sowed in perfect soil so it won't be blown away. It is our faith that is to be solid as a rock since Christ is our rock.

Nevermind that about a sentence after Christ goes out of His way to rename Simon as the Rock, He then refers to "This rock" as what He will found His Church on.

Oy vey the Proddies make it so hard. Sola Scriptura apparently means taking Scripture and convoluting it beyond the realm of logic in order to come up with doctrine just so they won't be like the Catholics.
166 posted on 04/17/2005 1:32:26 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I attended a Catholic College, and knew the nuns by name and the priests. They knew I wasn't Catholic from day one and warned me against taking communion. BUT, they'd take my tuition, no problem.

Grow up. The Church has its rules. Follow them or take your money elsewhere. The College was offering a service, which you paid for. It's a business transaction. It didn't turn you into a Catholic convert.

Man, some of these Proddies are acting like spoiled 6-year olds who have never heard the word 'No' before. Really, just unbelievable attitudes from alleged adults.
167 posted on 04/17/2005 1:35:55 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
There is simply no exegesis that requires it be a literal meaning.

John 6:53-58, on its face, seems to confirm what the RC's claim about the Real Presence:

53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves.
54 “He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
55 “For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. 56 “He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.
57 “As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me, he also will live because of Me.
58 “This is the bread which came down out of heaven; not as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever.”
-- John 6:53-58 [NASB]
Taken in its most literal and straightforward interpretation, this seems to suggest that Christ commanded people to literally feed upon himself - and that was clearly the sense in which his hearers took it (and they didn't like it one bit; many left over this). From this passage, as well as 1Co. 11, it is easy to exegete the Real Presence, if one sees fit.

Now, as Presbyterians, you and I both see Communion as a sign of the covenant, so that we are symbolically feeding upon Christ. Christ is symbolically and spiritually present in Communion; not physically. We reject the Catholic line of thinking that communion wafers are in accidence unchanged, but in essence, become the Body of Christ. We're close, in that we believe that they are spiritually His body, but reject the accidence/essence thing as a medieval theological invention.

But Catholics believe in the accidence/essence distinction as a matter of dogma - it's one of the defining characteristics of the Catholic Church. Indeed, you can reject the primacy of the Pope and any of their theological pronouncements since the Great Schism of 1056 A.D., as the Orthodox have, but because the Orthodox affirm transubstantiation as well, they are welcomed to partake of the Eucharist. But for those of us who do not believe in the Real Presence, they believe it is dangerous for us to take of it because we do not "discern the Lord's body," and don't know what we are getting ourselves into.

Because I have too much respect for the Catholic church to violate their beliefs, in the handful of instances I have found myself in a Catholic service, when the time for the Eucharist comes, I remain seated. I must respect their position, even while I disagree with it, because to violate it, to a Catholic, would be in reality, be desecration.

"You that abhor idols, do you desecrate temples?" (Rom. 2:22, my rendering based off of Louw-Nida's semantic domain of ierosuleoo, which has a broader meaning than the traditional rendering of "rob.") I don't care if you think that the Catholics are dead wrong in their belief of transubstantiation. You have no right to desecrate what they believe is sacred.

168 posted on 04/17/2005 1:41:46 PM PDT by jude24 (The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then gets elected and proves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Libertina, NO Christian denomination OTHER than the Catholic Church believe that Holy Commnion IS the BODY and Blood of Christ....not a one. They ALL say it is a SYMBOL of the Body and Blood of Christ.....but we Catholics alone believe it IS.

The Orthodox do. That's why all Catholic missals encourage Orthodox to come forward and take of the Eucharist, whereas I, as a Protestant, am advised I should not.

169 posted on 04/17/2005 1:43:17 PM PDT by jude24 (The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then gets elected and proves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die

I see ecumenicalism isn't important to you. It was important to Pope John Paul II.


170 posted on 04/17/2005 1:54:16 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (" It is not true that life is one damn thing after another-it's one damn thing over and over." ESV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die

"The absolute nerve of you..."

Thank you. I am amazed by the Charity of Catholics on this board addressing someone so insensitive as to question the Dogma of a Church that she has no intention of joining or participating in worship.

The question was answered with grace and compassion. The answers should be accepted with the same.


171 posted on 04/17/2005 1:58:59 PM PDT by OpusatFR (Just because you put lipstick on a pig doesn't mean it smells any better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Ecumenicalism had its limits to JPII. The Church was the Church, and he didn't give a damn if anyone disagreed with its theology; he wasn't going to change its teachings to pander to anyone.

The only way the RC's should give me Holy Communion is if they believe it is okay for me, as a guy who doesn't believe in the Real Presence, to take of it. If they believe it would work to my detriment, they are obligated to withhold it from me. What is not from faith is sin, Romans 14:23.

172 posted on 04/17/2005 2:00:16 PM PDT by jude24 (The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then gets elected and proves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: jude24

What is not from faith is sin, Romans 14:23.

I'll leave such judgements to God.


173 posted on 04/17/2005 2:02:45 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (" It is not true that life is one damn thing after another-it's one damn thing over and over." ESV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I attended a Catholic College, and knew the nuns by name and the priests. They knew I wasn't Catholic from day one and warned me against taking communion. BUT, they'd take my tuition, no problem. In all my time at their school, they couldn't explain to me WHY they had these prohibitions. I often wondered if the nuns themselves knew WHY.

Now that you have read this thread, do you understand why? Also, you can't be denied admission to any college base of religion , race, or creed, that is against the law, surely the scenarios are not one in the same to you.

174 posted on 04/17/2005 2:07:49 PM PDT by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
No offense, but are you saying that CHRISTIANS cannot take communion in a "Catholic" (Christian) church? This is one area where I think Catholics need to re-assess their dogma.

As Msgr. Augustine said, Catholics believe that "the Eucharist represents the true presence of Jesus Christ" in the Host.

That is not the case with Protestant denominations who believe that the host is merely symbolic. At a Protestant service I have been to, they passed a tray of chopped up Wonder Bread around, up and down the pews, as if they were passing out sandwiches at a picnic.

So, you have a situation where "Communion" is believed to be different things by different Christians.

The reason that Catholics found this incident so shocking is that it would literally represent the Body of Christ being sold on eBay.

To a Protestant without such a belief, it would merely represent a souvenir not much different that a Church program being sold on eBay.

For such reasons, Catholics do not consider Communion open to just anyone just as Protestant Churches would not consider Baptism opened to just anyone who wanted to try out the experience regardless of whether or not they believed in what Baptism means.

175 posted on 04/17/2005 2:08:01 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Someone with some guts. Good man Msgr. Augustine!!!!


176 posted on 04/17/2005 2:25:43 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

You are correct. The Eucharist IS Christ.


177 posted on 04/17/2005 2:27:05 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Don't care what others think. We KNOW what it is. That's what is importnat. What we KNOW NOT what others think. It's our religion.


178 posted on 04/17/2005 2:28:08 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xone
No problem.....Forgiveness is my middle name! :)

You said ....The difference is we don't believe the bread/wine are physically changed as Catholics do, but that the body and blood of Christ ARE present in, not symbolized by, the bread/wine.

Re-read your words......our Hosts do not turn into a slab of meat and blood, but it IS changed into the Body and Blood of Christ. That is what the Mass IS....that's what it's all about.

179 posted on 04/17/2005 3:18:54 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

OH MY!
I am so sorry. I misread your post and thought YOU were the non-Catholic!

I must have been in shock!


180 posted on 04/17/2005 3:21:36 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Oh Lord help me this day to keep my big mouth shut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson