Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

One lawmaker who 'gets' it:

"There's adequate protection for those people who desire to be separated from the secondhand smoke issue," said Senate Minority Leader Frank Watson (R-Greenville), who voted against the bill.

1 posted on 04/19/2005 4:54:46 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; MeeknMing; steve50; KS Flyover; Cantiloper; metesky; kattracks; ..

2 posted on 04/19/2005 4:55:14 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Let me correct the good Senator's words:

\"This is a simple matter of fairness and local control. There's no compelling reason for state, top-down control on smoking regulations," said Sen. John Cullerton (D-Chicago), lead sponsor of Senate Bill 254.

Should actually read:

"This is a simple matter of fairness and local control. There's no compelling reason for smoking regulations," said Sen. John Cullerton (D-Chicago), lead sponsor of Senate Bill 254.

Much better.

4 posted on 04/19/2005 5:02:08 AM PDT by Gabz (John Paul II, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

Good move, the guy cares about his career..


6 posted on 04/19/2005 5:12:21 AM PDT by The Mayor ( Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, and whose hope is the Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

Our governor and state legislators continue to pass laws and policies that restrict individuals and businesses.

I've had enough. My wife and I are seriously considering just getting out of here.

Texas is looking better and better.

To paraphrase Jerry Lee Lewis, Illinois can just kiss my a$$.


7 posted on 04/19/2005 5:12:22 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

"Towns could get more control over smoking"

This statement alone makes it clear that no one even recognizes that the "control" should be with the property owner. The assumption of private property rights is long gone.


12 posted on 04/19/2005 5:30:07 AM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson