Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR35
But over $3 billion for a destroyer with only 2 6" (155mm) guns?

Those aren't the primary weapons of any destroyer.

And you can't escort and defend surface ships with submarines.

18 posted on 04/19/2005 4:32:58 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist
Those aren't the primary weapons of any destroyer.

Change that to 'those aren't the primary weapons of any current destroyer' and you would have a valid point. While the ship will have limited capability (the original proposal was for 128 vertical launch cells but those also have to accommodate anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles needed for local defense) to launch Tomahawks, the primary weapon systems are intended to be the two autoloading, long range 155s. My recollection is that the range is slightly in excess of 100 miles, and each gun will carry about 750 rounds, although the final numbers may be different.

And you can't escort and defend surface ships with submarines.

Point 1 - That statement is incorrect. The attack boats were an integral part of the Carrier Strike Forces during the cold war.

Point 2 - It isn't being designed as an escort vessel, it is being designed for land attack. I don't think the current design even calls for a copter for ASW.

42 posted on 04/19/2005 7:01:55 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson