Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Relatives attacked 101st victims testify
Associated Press ^ | Apr. 26, 2005 | ESTES THOMPSON

Posted on 04/26/2005 8:39:02 AM PDT by Dubya

FORT BRAGG, N.C. - The parents of an officer killed by a soldier's grenade and rifle attack on a 101st Airborne Division camp in Kuwait testified Tuesday that their son's death created a hole in their lives that they can't fill.

"When you think about all the plans you were going to carry out ... that's not going to happen now," said Richard Stone, father of Air Force Maj. Gregory Stone. "With Greg, there's not a day that goes by that I don't think about him."

Gregory Stone and Army Capt. Christopher Seifert were killed and 14 other service members were injured when Sgt. Hasan Akbar attacked his fellow soldiers the night of March 22-23, 2003, as the unit was preparing to join the invasion of Iraq.

Stone's testimony was part of the prosecution's case in favor of a death sentence for Akbar, 34. The 15-member jury convicted Akbar last week of premeditated murder and attempted premeditated murder in the attack at the Army's Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait.

The defense is expected to present evidence in the sentencing phase Wednesday. Akbar's lawyers have not disputed his role in the attack, choosing to focus instead on an argument that he was too mentally ill to have premeditated the attack and therefore should not be sentenced to death.

Prosecutors have said Akbar was trying to prevent the killing of fellow Muslims during the U.S. invasion.

Stone "was the heart of our family. He was our hero," said his mother, Betty Lenzi. "And that grenade tore him away from us."

Stone was assigned to the 1st Brigade Combat Team of the 101st as an Air Force liaison officer, coordinating air support for ground troops.

On Monday, 15 survivors of the attack testified about physical and emotional damage they suffered.

Capt. Gregory Holden said he had shrapnel wounds to at least 13 parts of his body, including dozens of pieces of shrapnel in his left arm and a bone-mangling wound to his left leg that required him to wear a painful external brace for months.

"There's not a day that goes by that I don't put my foot down without some sort of pain," Holden said.

Lt. Col. Kenneth Romaine, who was wounded in the hands and thigh, sobbed on the witness stand as he spoke of taking Seifert's 1-year-old son for a haircut, and recalled attending Seifert's funeral in Pennsylvania and giving a medal to the officer's widow, Terri.

When he talked to Terri Seifert about the attack later at Fort Campbell, Ky., Romaine said, "It was obvious she had spent many hours going over in her mind what had happened."

Akbar was the first soldier since the Vietnam era to be prosecuted on charges of the murder of fellow soldiers at wartime. If he is sentenced to die, Akbar would become the sixth person on the military's death row.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 101st; hasanakbar; militaryfamilies; seifert

1 posted on 04/26/2005 8:39:03 AM PDT by Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dubya

I still don't understand why they are concentrating on the murder charges. Yes, he is guilty of murder, but if you look at his motive he is also guilty of treason. His intent was to decapitate his unit by taking out the command tent just prior to that unit going into combat.


2 posted on 04/26/2005 8:56:06 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

In any case, why hear testimony like this?

The equal protection of laws requires that the murderer receive the same punishment whether the deceased was a swell guy or a flaming a$$****.


3 posted on 04/26/2005 9:00:40 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
It can't be mentioned enough that Akbar was a muslim who pledged his allegiance to Mecca.
4 posted on 04/26/2005 9:01:52 AM PDT by Tuba Guy (' I has spoken !! ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
Yep, broke his oath of allegiance to the United States and broke faith with his fellow soldiers. Sounds like treason to me.
5 posted on 04/26/2005 12:30:28 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think treason is spelled out in the Constitution and requires some number of direct witnesses to the act. That is why people like John Walker (the dude selling secrets to the Soviets) and John Walker Lindh (Taliban Johnnie) were not charged with treason.

This is a case where he was apprehended in the act of trying to assassinate the command staff of his unit. To me the Army is watering down the charges by not pointing out who he killed and attempted to kill and why he did it.

6 posted on 04/26/2005 3:24:44 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
Agreed. I am tired of Americans fighting against us in this war on terrorism and everyone afraid of using the "T" word.
7 posted on 04/26/2005 5:58:20 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson