Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Stop Her Now site
1 posted on 05/03/2005 10:13:11 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: anniegetyourgun

So how does a site like this manage to ask for $10million and JimRob has to go begging each quarter.

With $10million FreeRepublic could 'stop her now'


2 posted on 05/03/2005 10:17:06 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun

Hillary, wife of an IMPEACHED president: A FACT!!!


5 posted on 05/03/2005 10:30:12 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun
If NY Republicans like pataki advisor Finkestein really wanted to stop Hillary they would have been grooming a candidate for the past 6 years instead of doing nothing.

I won't give one red cent to Finkelstein. It's his advice that turned Pataki into a pro-death penalty, cut taxes semi conservative to a extreme liberal Republican.

7 posted on 05/03/2005 10:47:04 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun

BTTT


8 posted on 05/03/2005 10:52:09 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun

The volume of evidence of malfaesence and key witnesses to oppose Hillary greatly exceed what we had against Kerry.

There will be too many holes in the dike (pun intented) for Hillary to plug.


9 posted on 05/03/2005 11:15:25 AM PDT by Uncledave (I want blue fingers!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun
``Stop Her Now'' effort is part of a growing mound of evidence that Republicans ``are prepared to do anything to defeat me.''

If she means anyting 'LEGAL' then she is correct.

11 posted on 05/03/2005 11:29:08 AM PDT by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun
``Stop Her Now'' effort is part of a growing mound of evidence that Republicans ``are prepared to do anything to defeat me.''

If she means anything 'LEGAL' then she is correct.

12 posted on 05/03/2005 11:29:58 AM PDT by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun

"the Republicans and their right-wing allies are going to be hitting us hard with false charges,"

That was a good move on her part. Now anything anybody says about her, she can say, "See, I told you this was going to happen. The old vast right wing conspiracy is at it again."


13 posted on 05/03/2005 11:45:16 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun; areafiftyone; kingattax; Pharmboy; doug from upland; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; ...
I BELIEVE TODAY WAS THE BEGINNING OF THE DAVID ROSEN - HILLARY CLINTON CAMPAIGN FRAUD TRIAL. HAS ANYONE FOUND ANY OTHER BREAKING NEWS ABOUT THAT EVENT?

Anti-Clinton Group Joins With Former Clinton Donor
By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ
Published: May 3, 2005

WASHINGTON, May 2 - The man whose claims are behind the recent criminal indictment of Hillary Rodham Clinton's former fund-raising director is collaborating with a conservative group in California on a project to publicize potentially damaging information about the Clintons.

The man, Peter Paul, has enlisted the support of the United States Justice Foundation, a conservative legal advocacy group, to start the Hillary Clinton Accountability Project, a venture meant to focus public attention on a 2000 fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton that is at the center of the federal government's criminal case.

Once dismissed as yet another anti-Clinton gadfly, Mr. Paul has suddenly become a major source of problems for the Clintons and their political associates.

A well-connected figure with a criminal history that dates back to the 1970's, Mr. Paul says he organized the star-studded fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton in 2000 to win Mr. Clinton's support on a business venture he was undertaking. But when his relationship with the Clintons soured after the event, he turned on them.

He has accused the Clinton campaign in a civil suit of falsely reporting that the August 2000 gala cost far less than the nearly $2 million he claims to have spent to organize the event. This January, federal authorities produced an indictment charging that David Rosen, the finance director of Mrs. Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign, had underreported the cost of the affair.

Responding to Mr. Paul's latest endeavor, David E. Kendall, a lawyer for the Clintons, called Mr. Paul's character into question. "Peter Paul is a man with an impressive record of felony convictions, currently in federal custody," he said. "Most of his civil suit has already been dismissed and the remainder has no merit."

The anti-Clinton project that is being undertaken by Mr. Paul and his conservative allies in California will make use of documents and other materials that Mr. Paul says stem from his role producing the 2000 event, including bank statements, canceled checks and film of him with the Clintons.

Gary Kreep, the executive director for the justice foundation, said it had established a Web site, www.hillcap.org, that would provide updated information concerning the criminal case against Mr. Rosen, as well as updated information about a civil suit that Mr. Paul has filed against the Clintons. (The site was still under construction on Monday.) He said the foundation planned to use its existing direct-mail operation to both raise money and disseminate information about those cases.

Mr. Kreep also said the foundation planned to cover the legal costs from the civil suit, in which Mr. Paul claims he gave close to $2 million in services and donations to Mrs. Clinton's Senate campaign based on promises that Mr. Clinton would join an Internet venture of his. Mr. Paul claims these promises were never fulfilled.

"We want to get to the truth of all this and make sure the public knows about it," Mr. Kreep said.

In a separate interview, Mr. Paul went even further, predicting that the case could thwart any political aspirations that Mrs. Clinton has beyond New York. "This fund-raiser will ultimately be viewed as her Chappaquiddick and cost her the presidency," he said. "I've already got her campaign finance director indicted."

The timing of all this is troublesome for Mrs. Clinton, the junior senator from New York, who is up for re-election next year. While Mrs. Clinton is apparently not a subject of the investigation, questions about the 2000 fund-raiser have given her political enemies plenty of ammunition.

In fact, Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group that repeatedly sued the Clintons during their White House years, initially championed Mr. Paul's case. But a few months ago, Judicial Watch abruptly severed ties with Mr. Paul, who, in turn, accused the group of merely using his case to raise millions of dollars from people who dislike the former president and first lady.

The attention being given to Mr. Paul's charges underscore the growing concerns within the Clinton camp that Mrs. Clinton will be a primary target of national Republicans in 2006, despite her overwhelming popularity among voters in New York.

Mrs. Clinton's advisers have good reason to harbor such concerns. Republicans in New York and elsewhere around the country are warning their supporters that Mrs. Clinton will be in a position to run for the presidency in 2008 if she is not defeated in New York next year.

But that said, Republicans are having trouble recruiting top-tier candidates like Rudolph W. Giuliani or George E Pataki to run against her. Instead, the list of possible challengers being mentioned include Edward F. Cox, a lawyer who is the son-in-law of Richard M. Nixon, and Dr. Antonia C. Novello, New York's state health commissioner, who was previously United States surgeon general.

19 posted on 05/03/2005 4:29:53 PM PDT by Libloather (Start Hillary's recount now - just to get it out of the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun

Instead of that website, a more effective one might be the one being introduced on Hannity and Colmes today --- www.hillcap.org. Peter Paul has the goods on Hillary. Peter will be on tonight and is scheduled for Hannity's radio show on Wednesday.


21 posted on 05/03/2005 4:34:31 PM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Don't be a CINO (Conservative in Name Only)
Don't listen to CINO's in politics,
the Main Stream CINO media,
and even here on Free Republic.

Remember all who told you not to worry about klintoon, hitlery and reno
after the 2000 election?

Remember all who said Ashcroft would prosecute them.

Remember Chinagate, Pardongate, Waco, Vince Foster, the Jewish town in NY etc., etc., etc. ?

Well reno ran against Jeb Bush and hitlery wants to beat Hanoi Kerry in 08

Are YOU willing to listen to the CINO's again?


22 posted on 05/03/2005 5:16:49 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Be wary of the "Move On" FReepers! They want Hanoi Kerry to get a "free pass" mmmm Wonder Why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson