Tancredo sides with the Democrats, calling for DeLay to step down, he also attacks President Bush, practically called him a traitor in an article Tancredo wrote for the Los Angeles Times, but that's all just fine with some people.
But if someone points that out, like Cannon, then people attack him.
Read this to see how he is attacking the President.
TANCREDO: This Land Is Whose Land?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1394585/posts
And here is Tancredo's statement about DeLay from his own website, he is still calling for him to step aside and delight the Democrats.
http://tancredo.house.gov/pressers/04.15.05%20Tancredo%20Statement%20on%20DeLay.htm
====
I guess Tancredo thinks that the Democrats will be better to stem the flow of illegal immigration, the way he is helping them, by attacking Republicans.
So, what IS Tancredo's REAL AGENDA?
This is where Tancredo puts the knife in, right?
I believe they are being leveled in the hopes of bringing him down, and with him the Republican Majority
This must be where he turns the knife, right?
However, if the Majority Leader were to temporarily step aside so that these trumped up charges can be dealt with in a less hostile environment, as they have proven to be an unnecessary distraction, it may be a productive move
And this is where he sides with the Democrats, right?
I don't agree with Tancredo about DeLay, but it's hardly backstabbing.
I won't "practically" call Bush a traitor. He IS a traitor, for his calling the Minutemen vigilantes but especially his allowing and urging millions of illegals to swarm into the country. Add to this his promotion of "mental health screening" for all children in schools, and his overspending more than any U.S. President since Lyndon Johnson....
I don't know about Delay. If he's promoting illegal immigration or not. But Bush deserves to be tarred and feathered and impeached.