Skip to comments.
New Technique Produces 10-carat Diamond
National Science Foundation ^
| 5-16-05
Posted on 05/16/2005 3:19:04 PM PDT by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Single-crystal diamond block formed by CVD process on six faces of a substrate diamond
The CVD process can produce a variety of single crystal diamonds.
AND I WANT A FEW OF THOSE BABIES ..;)
1
posted on
05/16/2005 3:19:07 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
To: STARWISE
If they get good at making these flawless diamonds, would they be considered the same value as a natural flawless diamond?
2
posted on
05/16/2005 3:23:01 PM PDT
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: STARWISE
Impressive! Thanks for posting this!
3
posted on
05/16/2005 3:23:46 PM PDT
by
Bonaparte
To: STARWISE
I wouldn't mind having a whole collection of them. :o)
4
posted on
05/16/2005 3:25:36 PM PDT
by
GoLightly
To: STARWISE
Great! I'll never suffer another scratched camera lens.
Of course, I'll have to hock all the cameras and telescopes to afford the lens....
5
posted on
05/16/2005 3:26:20 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more work horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: STARWISE
6
posted on
05/16/2005 3:26:41 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
If they get good at making these flawless diamonds, would they be considered the same value as a natural flawless diamond? Probably not. No good reason why not though (rarity and "natural" being the only differentiating properties), just that people and markets are sometimes irrational.
7
posted on
05/16/2005 3:27:34 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
Natural flawless means, to a jeweler, no imperfections seen with a 10 power loupe. If these are truly flawless, then they would be differentiated from natural diamonds, but since they would be "better" than a natural diamond, the value would be ???????
8
posted on
05/16/2005 3:28:13 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 meant never having to say I was sorry......)
To: STARWISE
9
posted on
05/16/2005 3:29:43 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: STARWISE
I'll take one in every color! ;-)
10
posted on
05/16/2005 3:30:06 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
("Harry Reid in stripes, I kinda like that image." -Tagline courtesy of DFU. Thanks!)
To: MindBender26; Cboldt
I guess we'll wait and see what happens, it will be interesting. I guess we'll be in trouble when we get good at making "gold" that is just like the real thing. ;)
11
posted on
05/16/2005 3:30:34 PM PDT
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: STARWISE
1 millimeter per hour may be possible Moore's law applies -- I bet -- we'll see diamond window panes in our lifetime.
12
posted on
05/16/2005 3:31:53 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
We already can make gold. Better than 'traditional' gold.
13
posted on
05/16/2005 3:36:09 PM PDT
by
datura
(Fix bayonets. Seal and Deport.)
To: STARWISE
"Finally, new shapes have been fabricated with the blocks of the CVD single crystals."
New shapes? They're "growing" diamonds that are faceted already? Or am I misunderstanding something here?
To: Bonaparte
"If they get good at making these flawless diamonds, would they be considered the same value as a natural flawless diamond"
Depending on efficiency, the bottom could fall out of the diamond market.
15
posted on
05/16/2005 3:40:37 PM PDT
by
DaGman
To: DaGman
Some people need their diamonds to come from the earth, just throw some dirt on it and raise the price.
16
posted on
05/16/2005 3:47:31 PM PDT
by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(You know it's Springtime in Cape Cod when a Kennedy is driving on the sidewalk.)
To: STARWISE
When they come in cereal boxes then we'll be getting
somewhere.
This could have some interesting applications though.
17
posted on
05/16/2005 3:47:49 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: STARWISE
I'm not interested unless it will cure cancer.
18
posted on
05/16/2005 3:50:06 PM PDT
by
Luke
(CPO, USCG (Ret))
Who says size isn't everything, dahling?
19
posted on
05/16/2005 3:52:16 PM PDT
by
P.O.E.
To: STARWISE
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson