Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JAWs
I don't understand what you're saying.  The doctor is stating that there's no evolutionary need for female orgasms....that the female orgasm is just for fun....subsequently it's logical to assume, based on the doctor's conclusion, that the male nipples would develop equally to a females, "just for fun"....since the female reproductive organ develops equally to a males in terms of orgasm.

The doctor is saying about the female sex organs the same thing you're saying about male nipples.....only we know the female orgasm isn't under-developed or vestigial, so it's entirely logical to assume the doctor doesn't have the slightest idea at all of what she's talking about.

29 posted on 05/17/2005 8:35:08 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (“I know a great deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Psycho_Bunny

The "just for fun" aspect of female nipples is learned, you know. There's no evolutionary need for them to be pleasurable. I would argue that if mens nipples were emotionally thought of as sensual, they would be sensual.

It's all up here >>>points to brain<<<


38 posted on 05/17/2005 8:43:39 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson