The very fact that a federal judge is championing laws against those speaking out against the activism of the judiciary raises questions about her mental fitness for such a position.
She's obviously biased in favor of a judiciary that has no oversight, no checks or balance against it, and has no compunction against running roughshod over American society with impunity.
I'm sure there are, or soon will be, cases coming before her that any competent lawyer would ask her to recuse herself from in light of her expressed prejudices.
It raises a question as to her "judicial temperment", IMO, not so much her 'mental fitness'.