[Cincinatus' Wife]

Former adviser Berger expects another domestic terrorist attack***.........Berger was a senior adviser to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry during the 2004 campaign. He was widely believed to be in line to become the first secretary of state in a Kerry administration. But Berger resigned his post after it came to light that he had removed sensitive documents involving anti-terrorist policy from the National Archives the year before.

Last month, Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor. Federal prosecutors are recommending he be fined $10,000 and stripped of his security clearance for three years.

"I've made a mistake and I've taken responsibility for it," Berger said Monday when asked by a reporter if he saw the prosecution as politically motivated. "I'm ready to move on and not cast blame."***

[leadpenny]

Traveshamockery.

[Liz]

Ponder this: when caught with the goods, Berger admitted to taking top secret documents the Archives did not even know went missing.....leading one to conclude, Berger took a lot more than has been revealed, a lot more than even the Archives knew about.

We need to make very certain that we, the people, got something in return for Berger's plea deal. Like for whose benefit the documents were being stolen, when was the order given, who was involved in the conspiracy, and who knew about it .......

Apparently Berger's plea deal is conditioned on Berger's "cooperation." This is what we demand to know:

(1) Have all the people who conspired with Berger been named and prosecuted?

(2) Did Berger actually destroy stolen docs--as he said---or are they being secreted for Berger's self-serving reasons: (a) for Hillary's campaign in exchange for Berger getting a political appointment, for (b) Berger's financial benefit in his oil consulting business, (c) to coverup 9/11?

(3) Berger admitted to stealing documents the Archives did not list as missing---what did he do with these? Is his plea deal conditioned on Berger returning these as well?

(4) who was in on the coverup?

In a public statement, Noel Hillman, chief of the Justice Department’s public integrity section, would not discuss Berger’s motivation, but said the former national security adviser understood the rules governing the handling of classified materials.

And why isn't the public allowed to share the info about Berger's motivation?? Why is Hillman holding this back? These compelling questions should be posed to the proper authorities.

Here's where you can send your concerns about Berger's plea deal. This is the judge who will sentence Berger July 8. Caution: phone nunber listed is a prosecutor's personal phone line - keep messages short and civil.

U.S. Magistrate Deborah Robinson
c/o US District Court
US Dept of Justice
Judiciary Center
555 4th Street NW
Washington, DC 20530

PHONE (202) 514-6933

[sneakers]

Stealing old documents must be getting to be more prevalent. We just had a man arrested recently for stealing records out of our office (approx. 1814-1824), after a year-long investigation. He also stole documents from other courthouses in Pa. Thing is, none of them sold for more than about $15.00! Not worth getting a police record for! He, too, was selling them on EBay. )

All of you Freepers who are Archivists and Records Managers - don't trust ANYONE! We trusted one person, and this is what happened.

[tomakaze]

re:"This sentence sends a very clear signal that theft of cultural property belonging to the American people will not be tolerated," U.S. Archivist Allen Weinstein said in a statement.
"Unless you are well connected like say, a Sandy Burger" He added

[patriot_wes]

"This sentence sends a very clear signal that theft of cultural property belonging to the American people will not be tolerated"

Unless of course the theft is about documents the government no longer wants you to see.

http://givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Update06-17-04.htm