Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2005 5:51:43 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc

Does this mean the French won?


2 posted on 05/28/2005 5:53:21 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

3 posted on 05/28/2005 5:53:28 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

I thought not.


4 posted on 05/28/2005 5:53:42 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
For the last 50 years historians have believed the odds were at least four to one.

What did historians believe were the the odds between 1451 and 1955?

6 posted on 05/28/2005 5:57:24 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Question Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
“The figures have been exaggerated over the centuries for patriotic reasons,”
What agenda? I don't see an agenda?
8 posted on 05/28/2005 5:59:30 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Warning: Frequent sarcastic posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

The French still got their butts kicked, a common thread in their history.


9 posted on 05/28/2005 5:59:31 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

As I recall, this battle pitted French knights against stout Englishmen armed with longbows. The French knights continued to charge against them all day and were basically picked off by the archers. At nightfall the French quit. Here is my question: Were the French knights paid recruits? This doesn't fit in with what a knight was.


13 posted on 05/28/2005 6:06:14 PM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; Right Wing Professor
does this mean Shakespeare must now be revised to read: "We few many, we happy band of brothers..."?
16 posted on 05/28/2005 6:11:46 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Henry: "The fewer men, the greater share of honour. God's will! I pray thee, wish not one man more."

Westmoreland: "Anon, my lord, thou hasn't as few men as once thought. No longer canst thou proclaim we few--instead, thous't must proclaim we numerate but still not as many as the frogs."

Crowd: Anon, anon anon-on-anon!

18 posted on 05/28/2005 6:13:35 PM PDT by Jagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Battlefield Detectives - Agincourt
22 posted on 05/28/2005 6:21:09 PM PDT by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

It still is an astounding victory, because the English were 4/5 footsoldiers, and most of their knights were dismounted. They relied heavily on archers. The French were overwhelmingly knights and were slaughtered in the mud. No matter how many French died, it marked the end of knight-based cavalry in Europe.


30 posted on 05/28/2005 6:37:32 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

How about the casualties on both sides.? Is it still true that the number of English/Welsh deaths can be numbered in the dozens and the French lost thousands?


42 posted on 05/28/2005 7:27:04 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

So what.

The British still beat a larger force of Frenchmen, and I'm sure the number of heavily armed on the French side exceeded the number of heavily armed kbights on the British side, putting a humble peasant armed with a missle weapon on the same footing as a wealthy arisotcrat loaded down with expesnice armour and constant training.

It will be interesting to read this book and see if this just another piece of revisionist history.


45 posted on 05/28/2005 7:33:29 PM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Onyxx

"Once more" bump


47 posted on 05/28/2005 7:38:38 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper (Doing my part...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

"Hey, baby, my guys were outnumbered 4 to 1 at the Battle of Agincourt!"

58 posted on 05/28/2005 9:29:19 PM PDT by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; Pharmboy; indcons; blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach
A Blast from the Past.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

60 posted on 03/05/2007 9:32:48 PM PST by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Thursday, February 19, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

When it comes to accuracy I would side with British myth over French bookeeping any day of the week!


62 posted on 03/26/2008 8:41:01 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson