To: wagglebee
Well, if the cops are too lazy to fingerprint an item when possesion of same is an issue, I sure wouldn't blame Hollywood when the perp walks.
4 posted on
05/30/2005 11:35:27 AM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(End dependence on foreign oil- put a Slowpoke in your basement)
To: Squawk 8888
Well, if the cops are too lazy to fingerprint an item when possesion of same is an issue, I sure wouldn't blame Hollywood when the perp walks. It's kinda basic, really...in order to prove your case, you've got to prove that item A, be it weapon or contraband, belongs to the defendant. You'd think somebody'd take the time to dust for prints, rather than just expect the jury to take the prosecutor's say-so.
5 posted on
05/30/2005 11:37:56 AM PDT by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: Squawk 8888
Well, if the cops are too lazy to fingerprint an item when possesion of same is an issue There was no "issue." The cops saw him throw it out the window and testified to that fact.
23 posted on
05/30/2005 12:55:34 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson