"Bring back the anti-national government!"
Posted on 06/01/2005 3:47:31 AM PDT by A. Pole
MOSCOW - A creeping crackdown is underway in Russia as the Kremlin has accused nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) of spying, moved to restrict political parties, and is considering measures that would weaken its print media.
Earlier this month Nikolai Patrushev, head of the state's FSB security service, charged that NGOs - including the US Peace Corps, the British Merlin medical relief foundation, and the Arab Red Crescent Society - were vehicles for "conducting intelligence operations under the guise of charity" activities. All the named groups issued angry denials.
Tough talk of limiting Russia's foreign-funded civil society, coupled with a new election law to limit the political field, does not represent a sudden shift, but rather a trend begun under President Vladimir Putin to tighten control over the country's press and public politics, experts say.
"We are returning to the Soviet system of governing, when all was officially under control, although in practice nothing was actually under control," says Dmitri Oreshkin, an expert with Merkator, an independent think tank. "The state being constructed through this process will be unitarian [have a single power center] and will, to a great extent, be an authoritarian state."
Individual NGOs have frequently been accused of spying by the FSB in the past, but Mr. Patrushev went further by alleging that even many think tanks were using legitimate educational exchanges and civil society projects to work for "regime change."
Demands by the security service chief that NGOs must be curbed are seen as an official reaction to recent popular revolts around Russia's periphery - Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan.
"To accuse NGOs of subversion is something new, and it is a sign the FSB is returning to the role of the former KGB," says Andrei Soldatov, editor of Agentura.ru, a website devoted to studying the intelligence services. "The FSB has recently reconstituted the KGB's 'anti-subversion' department. It is actively returning to old methods of surveillance over the whole society."
Many NGOs say the atmosphere is becoming chillier by the day and worry that a new law governing their activities, currently being drafted, could make life impossible. "International foundations are being actively pushed out of Russia," says Alexei Simonov, director of the Glasnost Foundation, an independent media watchdog. "Financing is becoming much harder; we already feel it."
Says Alexander Shuvalov, deputy director of Greenpeace-Russia: "We are being squeezed out of the mass media, and government agencies are actively thwarting our attempts to work. This is a continuation of policies we've felt for some years."
The new election law, passed in first reading by the Duma a week ago, has been planned since the terrorist attack on a school in Beslan last September. Experts say it will easily pass the needed two more readings in September. The law would prohibit coalitions of small parties, raising the threshold for entry into the Duma from 5 to 7 percent, making it easier for officials to disqualify candidates and ban independent observers from polling stations.
"The essence of these changes is to eliminate checks and balances and to distance citizens from real participation in the political process," says Nikolai Petrov, an expert with the Carnegie Center in Moscow.
Some experts suggest the Kremlin's goal is to ensure that only one or two big, officially approved parties will remain. "This is an attempt to create a one-party state," says Yury Levada, head of the Levada Center, an independent polling agency. "We are being pushed into the past, back to the state we previously inhabited."
Gleb Pavlovsky, who advises the Kremlin on political strategy, said this week that Russia's existing opposition parties are "useless" and that the Kremlin's goal will be to build a better opposition before the next Duma elections, slated for December 2007.
"Paradoxical as it may sound, it is a task for Putin's allies, not his opponents, to set up a functioning opposition," Mr. Pavlovsky said. He warned that existing Russian opposition parties may be working with outside forces to engineer a Ukrainian-style revolution against Putin. "That would rob Russian rule of legitimacy, while the decision-making center would shift to another force - one outside Russia," he said. "No one wants an opposition like that."
Experts say the Kremlin recently added several tough amendments to the draft electoral law to control the way media outlets cover elections.
According to the version passed by the Duma, journalists and editors will be held legally accountable for any false or unverified information, even if they have reprinted it from another source, such as a wire service. "This is a very dangerous law," says Andrei Kolesnikov, deputy editor of Izvestia, one of Russia's largest daily newspapers. "It will enable bureaucrats to take control over the media, especially newspapers."
During Putin's first term the Kremlin squeezed out independent TV networks, but largely left print alone. "Now the authorities are showing an interest in newspapers. The trend is to over-regulate everything; and it's a very bad trend," says Mr. Kolesnikov.
Tycoon's sentence sends chills MOSCOW - Oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, once Russia's richest man, is headed for a labor camp until 2012 after being sentenced Tuesday on six counts of fraud, tax evasion, and embezzlement.
The announcement caps a marathon 12-day session of Moscow's Meshchansky Court. The tedious point-by-point reading of the telephone book-sized judgment inspired a walkout by defense lawyers and led to quips that Mr. Khodorkovsky was condemned to "10 years of hearing his verdict read."
The nine-year sentence meted out to Khodorkovsky and his codefendant Platon Lebedev - minus time already served in detention - has experts warning that the dire political and economic fallout of the two-year-old "Khodorkovsky Affair" may now be irreversible.
"I had hoped until the very end that our leaders would put the country's interests first," says Vladimir Ryzhkov, an independent Duma deputy. "I fear this will lead to a wave of similar trials in the provinces. The message [to private business] is: sell and run away."
The signal to independent political actors is similar, says Vladimir Pozner, a leading TV commentator. "This verdict had very little to do with justice. It was a politically motivated case, based on [President Vladimir] Putin's dislike for Khodorkovsky and wish to eliminate what he saw as a political threat."
Since Khodorkovsky's arrest in October 2003, the oil company he founded, Yukos, has been torn apart by astronomically high back-tax bills, and its most productive units have been renationalized.
Russia's economic growth has slowed, capital flight has spiraled, and some foreign companies have backed off investment plans citing uncertainties provoked by the Yukos case.
Khodorkovsky's law- yers allege the case was marked by violations of judicial process. They plan to apply to the European Court of Human Rights, in addition to seeking redress through the Russian system.
Irina Khakamada, a leading liberal politician, says the outcome "proves that there is no independent court system in Russia.... What we have is an all-powerful General Prosecutor, which serves only the interests of our new Kremlin oligarchs."
But Natalya Vishnyakova, a spokewoman for Russia's Prosecutor, hailed the verdict as fair and objective. "It matches the actual circumstances of the case and the gravity of the crimes committed," she said.
Rainbow Revolutions bump
""MOSCOW - A creeping crackdown is underway in Russia as the Kremlin has accused nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) of spying, moved to restrict political parties, and is considering measures that would weaken its print media.
Earlier this month Nikolai Patrushev, head of the state's FSB security service, charged that NGOs - including the US Peace Corps, the British Merlin medical relief foundation, and the Arab Red Crescent Society - were vehicles for "conducting intelligence operations under the guise of charity" activities. All the named groups issued angry denials.
Tough talk of limiting Russia's foreign-funded civil society, coupled with a new election law to limit the political field, does not represent a sudden shift, but rather a trend begun under President Vladimir Putin to tighten control over the country's press and public politics, experts say.
"We are returning to the Soviet system of governing, when all was officially under control, although in practice nothing was actually under control," says Dmitri Oreshkin, an expert with Merkator, an independent think tank. "The state being constructed through this process will be unitarian [have a single power center] and will, to a great extent, be an authoritarian state.""
Given the International Red Cross' behavior elsewhere, I am utterly unsurprised that the Red Crescent is under suspicion.
This movement by Putin is nothing but a justification to enhance his step toward dictatorship and neo-Stalinism, suppressing freedom of speech. This is a challenge against democracy and cannot be justified.
How do you know it? Do you have any evidence of Putin's intentions? What is the proof that he is not a patriot and that his reforms are not similiar to the de Gaulle's creation of the Fifth Republic?
Just because the mass media who are buddies with Soros and Khodorkovsky want you to think so? Or maybe pro-Chechen Rainbow Revolutionaries want you to think so?
One of my Russian teachers back in the 1980s told me that Russian political history is a pendulum that swings back and forth between oppression and freedom. If the pendulum swings too far in one direction or another, the whole system would collapse.
I thought that had actually occurred, when Gorbachev and the Soviet Union went down. It's interesting to watch how Putin started the pendulum again very gradually, almost imperceptibly. Now that it's gaining momentum again, Russians are reacting with either resignation or alarm.
"Bring back the anti-national government!"
If Putin regime wants to resurrect Stalinist practices of show trials, repressions, etc., it is going down one way or another. Russia had more then enough of its fair share of tyrants, thugs and mass-murderers and any new attempt at mass repressions will simply ruin the country. Hopefully, Putin regime will simply self-destruct and it will not take the country with it.
Haha I dont know if thats doublespeak or if they mean they were so incompetant that they had no control. Probaly the latter
Yes, I would like to see a democratic Russia, but not one subverted, top to bottom, by Soros and his mangy crew. That, after all, is no democracy at all. The same, of course, goes for Serbia and especially America. People who are for real human rights, including Christian human rights, need to give Soros the old heave-ho and form brand-new human rights organizations.
They're not spies, well at least not in Israel, there they're weapons/suicider delivery vehicles.
A more accurate statement would be between centralization and decentralization: aka: Peter the Great was a huge centralist. Catherin was a decentralist (moderate), her son Paul was a huge centralist, followed by a weak and decentralist Alexander I. Nicholas I started as a decentralist but after revolts became a very strong centralist. Alexander II was a huge decentralist, pushing a lot of power to the Zemstovs (local assemblies). He was killed by socialists and his son Alexander III was a massive centralist. Nicholas II was a weak centralist fighting against massive decentralists. Lenin started out as a moderate centralist and became a weak decentralist (NEP) followed by Stalin a massive centralist. After Stalin came Khrushchov who was so decentralist he forced a lot of the bureaucratic heads to move their offices out of Moscow and into the country side. For this, he was eventually over thrown by strong centralists.
Eventually they lost power to Gorbachov a weak decentralist who lost power (and the SU) to Gorbachov, such a massive decentalist that the nation almost fell apart. Now it's swung back towards centralism under Putin.
Actually that says bring back the anti-peoples (Narodni) government.
bump
Just got back from there on Saturday. I'm glad I'm American.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.