Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Infanticide in Virginia - (beyond "disturbing")
WASHINGTON TIMES.COM ^ | JUNE 7, 2005 | EDITORIAL

Posted on 06/07/2005 4:31:28 PM PDT by CHARLITE

What happens when a court constitutionalizes infanticide? We ask the question because a federal appeals court in Virginia appears to have done just that. In a contentious 2-1 decision last week that places Virginia in the hot seat of the abortion debate, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond threw out Virginia's partial-birth abortion ban, sanctioning the actions of an abortionist plaintiff who crushes the heads and dismembers the arms and legs of infants as they emerge from the womb.

The law the court struck down was similar to the partial-birth abortion ban Congress passed in 2003 and was one of the most reasonable attempts by a state legislature anywhere to end this barbaric procedure. But the court blocked it, thus giving its approval to a practice a large majority of Americans rightly regard as murder.

The "infanticide" claim doesn't originate with us; it comes from Judge Paul V. Niemeyer, one of the three justices who sits on the court. In his 27-page dissent, Judge Neimeyer calls the ruling "a bold, new law that, in essence, constitutionalizes infanticide of a most gruesome nature."

In some uncommonly harsh words for his colleagues, Judge Niemeyer called the ruling "unfit for the laws of a people of liberty" and said it "unnecessarily distances our jurisprudence from that of the Supreme Court and from general norms of morality."

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: abortion; appellatecourt; courts; judicial; lateterm; partialbirth; virginia

1 posted on 06/07/2005 4:31:29 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Judge Niemeyer called the ruling "unfit for the laws of a people of liberty" and said it "unnecessarily distances our jurisprudence from that of the Supreme Court and from general norms of morality."

Obviously someone that knows his history. Hitler believed children could be eliminated up to the age at which they could feed themselves.

2 posted on 06/07/2005 4:34:05 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

This is the second article in a row that I have been able to praise a judge...Bless you Judge Niemeyer---

Too bad your fellow judges don't see it your way.

I think there should be made a law, that any judge or jury that would vote IN FAVOR of a partial-birth abortion, should have to witness one in person, first!!!


3 posted on 06/07/2005 4:35:53 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Ah, yes. But there are those who insist that any criticism of judges is unwarranted, you see, based upon the notion that judges should be perfectly free to "interpret" a document any way they wish.

Every man a philologist, you know.; every judge a creative deconstructivist genius.

4 posted on 06/07/2005 4:41:45 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
What happens when a court constitutionalizes infanticide?

Impeachment and conviction is what should happen. What will happen is nothing.

5 posted on 06/07/2005 4:43:51 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Niemeyer . . . sounds like a good pick for Supreme Court Justice.


6 posted on 06/07/2005 4:50:41 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Just you wait. Eventually, the Liberal generation of that grew up in the 60s and 70s will pass out of power, and those who grew up under Reagan and both Bushes will take their place.

That's when we'll move back to a better America (hopefully).

At least there are SOME judges who interpret the law, and not make it.


7 posted on 06/07/2005 4:55:50 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic (If Benedict Arnold were alive today, he'd be pardoned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Who--weeee don't you know the dems would go ballistic if this judge was nominated!!!

They will not openly admit a litmus test, but there is--anyone who isn't a fan of abortion, need not apply!!!


8 posted on 06/07/2005 5:26:24 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marty60

"Hitler believed children could be eliminated up to the age at which they could feed themselves."

And noted Princeton "ethicist" Peter Singer agrees with him, in principle if not in detail.


9 posted on 06/07/2005 6:11:40 PM PDT by jocon307 (Can we close the border NOW?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

How on earth can anyone find LIFE so expendable. The culture of death and hate is in control of the earth.


10 posted on 06/07/2005 6:23:17 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marty60

"The culture of death and hate is in control of the earth."

We live in a fallen world, what you say is true. But we are battling it every day.


11 posted on 06/07/2005 8:02:06 PM PDT by jocon307 (Can we close the border NOW?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson