[Tempestuous]

" 'What's the answer to world hunger?' And his answer was like, 'Sharing!'"

I would have said "helping to provide education and opportunity for people to learn how to feed and support themselves".

[pissant]

That's too sophisticated for socialists.

[ArGee]

I would have said "helping to provide education and opportunity for people to learn how to feed and support themselves".

I would have said, "Development of cheap, fossil-fuel based energy production which, unfortunatly, runs the risk of global warming. It is much better to let people starve than to run the risk of warming the planet."

OK, I would not have said that.

Shalom.

[cricket]

[ 'What's the answer to world hunger?' And his answer was like, 'Sharing!'"

I would have said "helping to provide education and opportunity for people to learn how to feed and support themselves". ]

Better than sharing for the long haul and of course, we do not know of any Democratic nations that have a starving population. . .but we will never hear 'Democracy' offered as a solution, from the Lib side of the world. . (hello, Brad Pitt. . .).

That said, have always had a great deal of respect for the Dahlai Lama. . .but somewhat disappointed seeing how he has allowed himself to be used by the Hollywood crowd. . .and maybe a little 'vice versa'. . .