Posted on 06/10/2005 4:25:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Borrowing the kind of apocalyptic language used by the warrior characters that made him one of Hollywood's biggest stars, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is about to decide whether to embark on "the great battle."
He has until Monday to call a special election in November to let the voters of California decide whether to clamp down on spending, change the way electoral districts are drawn and make it harder for teachers to win tenure.
Unable to get his way with the Legislature, the Republican governor has been threatening for months to take his case straight to the voters who brought him to power in 2003 in a recall election.
On his side are anti-tax conservatives and business interests; on the other, the state's majority party, the Democrats, and some of California's powerful unions, including teachers and other public employees.
"This is the nuclear war we've been dreading and screaming about and trying to avoid," said Steve Maviglio, spokesman for Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, a Los Angeles Democrat.
The outcome of the special election could set the tone for the rest of Schwarzenegger's term and, some say, perhaps even determine whether he runs again in 2006.
"In his early months, Schwarzenegger built up a great deal of political momentum," said Jack Pitney, a government professor at Claremont McKenna College in Southern California. "In recent months, he's had some difficulty. The special election will either restore his momentum or increase his problems."
But after three statewide elections in the past two years, voter fatigue may be setting in.
A recent poll by the Public Policy Institute of California found that 62 percent of likely voters opposed plans for a special election. California's county governments are asking the state to cover the election's $70 million to $80 million cost.
The most controversial of Schwarzenegger's three proposals is a spending cap that would impose automatic cuts if revenue fell below projected income. It would do away with a voter-approved 2000 measure that sets a minimum funding requirement for public schools. The governor insists the measure is crucial for returning California to fiscal health after years of deficit spending.
He also wants legislative and congressional districts to be drawn by a panel of retired judges, which Schwarzenegger hopes will send more moderates to Sacramento.
And he wants to extend from two years to five the amount of time teachers would have to work to get tenure.
The governor has said that he wanted to work out compromises with lawmakers on all three ideas, but that the Democrats have been unwilling to bargain.
"The public employees were not interested in a compromise with Schwarzenegger," Republican consultant Kevin Spillane said. "Their goal was not to negotiate but destroy him."
The Democrats said it is the governor who has not seriously considered alternatives.
Still, some hold out hope for a compromise in the next few months, even if Schwarzenegger signs an executive order calling the election.
"I'm always hopeful," said Assemblyman Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield, the Republican minority leader. "But I have not seen any movement from them."
As for what may happen beyond Nov. 8, Spillane said: "Schwarzenegger is not someone who likes to go out on the down slope. If he loses in the special election, I think it would increase the chances that he runs again. If he wins, he might declare victory and walk away."
___
On the Net:
Governor's home page: http://www.governor.ca.gov
California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov/
California Assembly: http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/defaulttext.asp
---
Just what we need, more moderates. .. lol
Gov.....if you're reading this.....you haven't a clue how popular you'd be with MOST OF THIS STATE if you went full bore and cleaned house. Lowered taxes. Forget the stupid gun laws. Get tough on gangs and the border. Get real honest to gosh CONSERVATIVES in here.
Dare you!
Sir.
Wouldn't moderate judges be pulling the bench to the right?
I'm not familiar with CA courts, but I figure most of the judges must have sand pouring out their left ears.
Wouldn't moderate judges be pulling the bench to the right?
I'm not familiar with CA courts, but I figure most of the judges must have sand pouring out their left ears.
-----
One would think so, but the current CA Supreme Court and many of the intermediate court judges, etc have been appointed by previous Republican governors and do not reflect the erratic behavior of the state as a whole the last few years under c'Rat rule.
It still pays to shop around when it comes to judges tho.
In this special election, put a ballot measure that will revert California back into a part-time legislature.
Not on the Supreme Court, anyway. And he's already appointed La Raza attorneys to judgeships.
Counting Brown, the state Supreme Court currently has three women and four men. Six justices are Republicans, and one is a Democrat. Two are of Asian descent. One is Latino.Mercury News
The governor has followed through with his pledge to take a bipartisan approach to selecting judges, with Democrats and independents making up about 40 percent of his picks.
He's looking for more of those Kennedy Konservatives.
I'll believe it when I see it.
california patio lizards vote democrat.
Watching what the Dumbs are trying to do to Arnold is like watching people on the Titanic throwing the captain overboard and saying, "We're saved from his incompetence!"
I think all three initiatives are seriously flawed and do little to nothing to solve the state's problems, anyway. He doesn't seem to have grass roots support for them and certainly has a ton of opposition. I think all the AS/Nunez histrionics are just wasting valuable time where they could actually be doing something positive. Of course neither seem capable of that.
Disappointment? Yeah, lots of it.
Now we're stuck with long-on-talk/short-on-action Arnold, aka Gray Davis Lite.
"Disappointed" doesn't begin to describe it.
At least with Gray, there was vocal GOP opposition to his leftist moves, keeping him somewhat in check. When Arnold put 1/5 of the state lands under an unelected, unaccountable conservancy, (R)s twiddled their thumbs. When he stands on stage with Gore, Kofi Annan, and Gavin Newsom acknowledging the great threat of global warming, (R)s say nothing. When he proposes the largest budget in history, at growth rates larger than before, they sound as idiotic talking about 'cuts' as their (D) counterparts. Hey, $116 Billion spending plan isn't as bad as $120 Billion, or $150 Billion. It's a good thing, right?
What a mess...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.