Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Irish language recognised by EU
BBC News ^ | June 13, 2005

Posted on 06/13/2005 1:45:27 PM PDT by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: infowarrior
English, as a language, is only dominant in Ireland due to policies of the British crown to stamp out "Irishness" in Ireland throughout its occupation of the isle. These policies were enforced by force, at times lethal force. This is not an attempt to foist off acceptance of a language of incoming immigrants as a working language of the people, but a recognition of a language which had been spoken there, by native inhabitants for numerous millenia. Surely you can see the difference...

No, I don't.

Whatever the reason, it is a dead language, or at least on life support. It makes no more sense than recognizing Welsh, or Cornish or any of the dozens of other archaic languages of europe. You can bet that Brittany, and the Basque and Catalan will be agitating for their languages acceptance next.

So9

21 posted on 06/13/2005 2:47:00 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
It's not just an inconsequential recognition of the language, now every document, speech, minute, every conceivable written document that the EU produces will have to be simultaneously cross-translated to Gaelic. So, if a minister gives a short speech in some other obscure language, the EU has to have qualified translators at the ready. 13 language combinations means a whole lot of translators and some strange combinations.

It's a jobs program really.

Not to mention the several languages will be added each year.

All this because the French opposed a common language (English) to which all documents could be cross translated.
22 posted on 06/13/2005 2:48:07 PM PDT by keat (Posting code without previewing since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Euroam
Basque and Catalan are recognized by the EU.

More proof of the EU's irrelevance to the real world.

So9

24 posted on 06/13/2005 2:49:15 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

I have it via my grandmother, born in Ireland, but she was born before independence. Anyway, it takes forever.


25 posted on 06/13/2005 2:51:37 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Intelligent design is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Euroam
I got no dog in this race.

But I do have a question for future reference.

What will they call 'Bushmills' after the change?

27 posted on 06/13/2005 2:55:25 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Euroam
I agree that the EU's irrelevant, but not because its members speak more languages than you're comfortable with.

One reason the EU is irrelevant is that they never realized that unifying communication was more important than unifying currency or cheese making regulations.
They started with half a dozen languages and their plan should have been to eventually narrow down to one, English, because everyone already speaks it as a first of second language, and it was, and is, already the world's language of science and commerce.

So9

29 posted on 06/13/2005 2:59:26 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Euroam

I recall an Irish buddy of mine telling me that the Gaelic in NW Ireland was quite different from that in SW Ireland, but I was not sure if he meant the language was totally different, or if regional dialect or accent made things relatively unintelligable across the two areas.


30 posted on 06/13/2005 3:00:28 PM PDT by AzSteven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691

I lived in (the Republic of) Ireland for a year in the mid eighties. Most of the people I met were strongly opposed to having the North join the Republic. None of them were British.


31 posted on 06/13/2005 3:04:22 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: keat
13 language combinations means a whole lot of translators and some strange combinations.

1+2..+13=78 potential combinations. How many people can there be who can translate Gaelic into Latvian?

35 posted on 06/13/2005 3:07:59 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

"Surely you can see the difference..."



Of course I can see the difference, but will the EU when Dutch Muslims claim in 2010 that 20% of the residents of Holland speak Arabic, and that's twice the percentage as Gaelic speakers in Ireland? The EU apparatchiks aren't as reasonable as you and me.

One can blame the English oppressors until the cows come home for stamping out Gaelic in the 19th century (I am currently reading James Joyce's Ulysses, set in the early 20th Century, in which the eternal debate among the characters was whether the Irish language should be brought back), but the fact remains that English is the common language spoken by Ireland's 4 million citizens. I think its fine and dandy for the government of the Republic of Ireland to adopt Gaelic as a co-official language, but it is still spoken by a small minority of the citizens of a relatively small member of the EU, and thus the EU should not have adopted it as one of its 31 official languages.

BTW, the same arguments you used in favor of recognizing Irish Gaelic can be used by Native Hawaiians, or Cherokee, or Spanish speakers from Northern New Mexico, or many other groups who saw their language "stamped out." If Hawaii and Oklahoma and New Mexico wish to adopt those languages as co-official languages, that's fine with me, but the federal government shouldn't be forced to adopt them as co-official languages.


36 posted on 06/13/2005 3:08:28 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Euroam
America should learn this lesson. Once you open the door to multicultural recognition of one group, every other group is going to demand it as well.

Absolutely. We NEED an "English as Official Language" constitutional ammendment.

37 posted on 06/13/2005 3:10:37 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: untenured; keat
1+2..+13=78 potential combinations.

Actually, there are 21 languages so they need 231 different combinations.

38 posted on 06/13/2005 3:10:54 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: RWR8189


can't beat the best
40 posted on 06/13/2005 3:16:20 PM PDT by Rushgrrl (~brought to you from the illegal-rich state of California~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson