Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armed Forces Stretched Beyond Limit (UK)
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 6-15-2005 | Thomas Harding

Posted on 06/14/2005 6:33:26 PM PDT by blam

Armed Forces stretched beyond limit

By Thomas Harding, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 15/06/2005)

A damning report on the Armed Forces' ability to go on operations has concluded that more than a third of the military are experiencing serious weaknesses.

The National Audit Office says today that there is a potential crisis facing the military with so many troops deployed in operations overseas and a possible brigade-size operation in Afghanistan next year.

The Government's commitments abroad have used up a vast amount of equipment and led to serious curtailment of training, the Whitehall spending watchdog says.

Under the Ministry of Defence traffic light system, overall readiness of the forces for operations is now "amber", meaning that there are serious shortcomings, one step below "red" or "critical".

Among the chief criticisms in the report published today is the practise of "cannibalisation", whereby equipment is plundered for spare parts. It has become so prevalent that the instances of ships being raided for spare parts have risen from five a month to 30.

Almost a quarter of Challenger 2 tanks and a third of the Royal Artillery's AS90 guns had to be cannibalised to make the rest of the force operational for Iraq.

The MoD was also "unable to sustain the majority of its helicopter fleets" beyond current peacetime activity "without heavy cannibalisation of equipment".

The auditors criticise cannibalisation as "inefficient and manpower intensive" and said that it reduced equipment that might be needed in future conflicts.

It praises the MoD for having a good system for reporting levels of operational readiness but it warns that there is a danger that the "cumulative effect of a series of minor risks" could have "serious impacts on the readiness of the Armed Forces" for future conflict.

Since coming to power in 1997, the Government has fought several substantial conflicts, creating a "high operational tempo". At a maximum the Armed Forces are supposed to be able to fight simultaneously two medium-scale conflicts and one small-scale engagement. In 2003 this more than doubled with the Iraq war, Afghanistan and commitments to the fire strike, Kosovo and Sierra Leone. The latest figures show the military to still be operating above its most demanding level of activity.

This risked reduced levels of training "leading to a skill fade" and "impacted negatively" on recruitment and retention rates, the report says.

Michael Ancram, the shadow defence secretary, said the lack of funds, training and equipment meant the Government was sending the forces to war "with one arm tied behind their back". "The risks that the MoD have been taking are utterly unacceptable and entirely driven by the Treasury's ambition to save funds," he said.

The Royal Navy has had its budget cut by £310 million in order to pay for spiralling Army costs. Some ships had been downgraded to "reduced support status", the report says, and would receive help only for defects affecting health and safety.

In the RAF, the ability of fighters to retain their "high end warfighting skills" was under threat by the reduction of fast jet flying times and there were shortages of spares for helicopters and reconnaissance aircraft.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armed; beyond; forces; limit; stretched; uk

1 posted on 06/14/2005 6:33:27 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

The military in the UK is in worse shape than I suspected.


2 posted on 06/14/2005 6:38:02 PM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

"a possible brigade-size operation in Afghanistan next year"

That's just east of Iran.
I wonder if the dates are already pencilled in for dealing with Iran.

Maybe the UK to free up US forces in Afghanistan for "other missions"?


3 posted on 06/14/2005 6:44:28 PM PDT by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Brits have marvelous military men and women. But they are stretched too thin.

God Bless them.

4 posted on 06/14/2005 6:52:28 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Wait until Au Canada has to someday to provide a force of more that 100 Combat Personnel with Combat Support in a tactical situation!

Mon Dieu!


5 posted on 06/14/2005 7:14:13 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plenipotentiary
"Maybe the UK to free up US forces in Afghanistan for "other missions"?"

Interesting take on the situation.

6 posted on 06/14/2005 7:24:59 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
The military in the UK is in worse shape than I suspected.

Yeah, they may be somewhat stretched. But don't believe everything you read in the press -- I'm not sure the situation is as dire as newspapers want us to believe.

7 posted on 06/14/2005 9:14:44 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

thanks


8 posted on 06/14/2005 9:17:59 PM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Seems to me that the UK military has always been underfunded compared to our military -- and they've been underfunded compared to their large accomplishments on the battlefield. I'd love to see them get more resources -- just imagine what they could accomplish with funding levels closer to U.S. troops!

If that were to happen they'd be way too powerful for the size of their population -- the rest of the world could only stand back in awe.

9 posted on 06/14/2005 9:28:22 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson