Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House RollCall Super Rifles export ban(see how your congressmen voted)
http://www.newsday.com ^ | 6 21 05 | The Associated Press

Posted on 06/21/2005 3:39:43 PM PDT by freepatriot32

The 278-149 roll call Thursday by which the House rejected an effort to restrict gun manufacturers' exports of high-powered, .50-caliber rifles.

A "yes" vote is a vote to pass the amendment restricting the gun exports. A "no" vote is a vote to reject the amendment.

Voting yes were 134 Democrats, 15 Republicans and no Independents.

Voting no were 65 Democrats, 212 Republicans and 1 Independent.

X denotes those not voting.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: atf; ban; bang; banglist; congressmen; donutwatch; electionscongress; export; house; how; nra; rifles; rollcall; see; super; voted; your
I bet you the 15 repubs that voted for it will get the full backing of the white house in their reelections over the conservatives that run in the primarys just like spector and insane mccain
1 posted on 06/21/2005 3:39:47 PM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee

ping


2 posted on 06/21/2005 3:40:16 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
3 posted on 06/21/2005 3:40:59 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

65 Democrats with a small functioning brain, who want to come back to the House next term -- I am surprised.


4 posted on 06/21/2005 3:41:45 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

you can focus on the 15 that voted yes, but I'd prefer to focus on the 65 DEMS who voted no.

this shows that there is a stong bi-partisian majority in the HOUSE in favor of RKBA


5 posted on 06/21/2005 3:42:39 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bourbon; onyx

I'll save you the trouble
I knew before I looked

MISSISSIPPI

Democrats -- Taylor, N; Thompson, Y.

Republicans -- Pickering, N; Wicker, N.


6 posted on 06/21/2005 3:42:46 PM PDT by WKB (A closed mind is a good thing to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Kind of surprised ole Artur Davis voted against this


7 posted on 06/21/2005 3:43:21 PM PDT by AzaleaCity5691 (I will never be reconstructed, Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
From Curt Weldon's (R-PA [7th District]) website (http://curtweldon.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=1373):

"Only a government that does not trust its citizens would refuse them the right to bear arms."

Maybe he trusts Americans and just doesn't like exports. :-/

8 posted on 06/21/2005 4:06:29 PM PDT by Gondring (The can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold dead hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I'm guessing the same, but the question I ask is, where should the GOP draw the line with that? For instance, should it confidently suppose that it can run a conservative in NYC? Bloomberg's probably about as good as it'll get there.

Or does the GOP have to hold the line everywhere to folks that agree 100% with the party platform in order to be conservative? Don't get me wrong--I'm asking on a theoretical basis. At which point does a national party get to say "we can't run that kind of conservative there, he'll have no chance at all?" Ever?


9 posted on 06/21/2005 4:12:43 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Yahoo!

Except for little Mary ducking this vote, California Republicans were solid.

Bono, X; Calvert, N; Cox, N; Cunningham, N; Doolittle, N; Dreier, N; Gallegly, N; Herger, N; Hunter, N; Issa, N; Lewis, N; Lungren, Daniel E., N; McKeon, N; Miller, Gary, N; Nunes, N; Pombo, N; Radanovich, N; Rohrabacher, N; Royce, N; Thomas, N.


10 posted on 06/21/2005 4:18:58 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Could anyone tell me why Taylor is still a Democrat? From here he looks fairly conservative from a conservative district. I am sure the Democrat party has left him in the dust years ago.


11 posted on 06/21/2005 4:48:04 PM PDT by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WKB; bourbon


Thank you. I'll not have to bother looking now.


12 posted on 06/21/2005 4:53:48 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bar-Face

Could anyone tell me why Taylor is still a Democrat? From here he looks fairly conservative from a conservative district. I am sure the Democrat party has left him in the dust years ago.




Good question. Some think he likes the "McCain Maverick"
look. Others think it's the high number of union shipyards
on the coast. Nobody really knows for sure. But his
votes don't really stray that far from the mainline dims.
He did vote to impeach Clinton. I will give him credit
for that.


13 posted on 06/21/2005 5:02:01 PM PDT by WKB (A closed mind is a good thing to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Mr Barrett will be pleased


14 posted on 06/21/2005 5:48:49 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

ARIZONA

Democrats -- Grijalva, Y; Pastor, Y.

Republicans -- Flake, N; Franks, N; Hayworth, N; Kolbe, N; Renzi, N; Shadegg, N.


15 posted on 06/21/2005 6:57:06 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

VERMONT

Independent -- Sanders, N.

Shock!


16 posted on 06/21/2005 7:08:22 PM PDT by Guillermo (42% of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudi and Bush continues to lick their boots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Maybe he trusts Americans and just doesn't like exports. :-/

From a letter by James Madison to Joseph C. Cabelle, dated 18 Sept, 1828

1. The meaning of the Phrase "to regulate trade" must be sought in the general use of it, in other words in the objects to which the power was generally understood to be applicable, when the Phrase was inserted in the Constn.

2. The power has been understood and used by all commercial & manufacturing Nations as embracing the object of encouraging manufactures. It is believed that not a single exception can be named.

I wonder what manufactures a ban on the export of .50 caliber rifles is supposed to encourage?

17 posted on 06/21/2005 7:18:11 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

The manufacture of better barrels and more accurate ammunition, plus lowering the price of them.


18 posted on 06/21/2005 8:50:17 PM PDT by B4Ranch ( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, Employers use 888-464-4218)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Colorado

Democrats -- DeGette, Y; Salazar, N; Udall, N.

Republicans -- Beauprez, N; Hefley, N; Musgrave, N; Tancredo, N.

Saladbar and Udall? Was that a pig that just flew by?

19 posted on 06/22/2005 5:38:36 AM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson