Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Other Watergate Conspiracy - (G. Gordon Liddy says John Dean really behind Watergate)
A.I.M.ORG ^ | JUNE 22, 2005 | CLIFF KINCAID

Posted on 06/22/2005 6:34:03 PM PDT by CHARLITE

One of the main culprits of the Watergate scandal, John Dean, who spent 4 months in prison, surfaced as a media hero. He has also surfaced as an expert on the alleged scandalous behavior of the Bush Administration. He wrote the book, Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush. But the facts, which have survived several challenges in court, indicate that Dean had a much bigger role in Watergate than reported by Woodward and Bernstein. The book Silent Coup argues that the Watergate break-ins were really meant to cover up embarrassing information about a call-girl ring whose "Madame" was a roommate of John Dean's wife, and that John Dean ordered the break-ins. Watergate, as Watergate figure G. Gordon Liddy maintains, was "a Dean Operation."

To the credit of MSNBC's Chris Matthews, he had Liddy on his June 1 show to comment on the naming of Mark Felt as Deep Throat. Liddy said it didn't add up. Liddy explained, "One, Woodward wrote about how Deep Throat, he had a long friendship with Deep Throat. There's no evidence that he ever had any kind of friendship with Mark Felt. Secondly, why would the number two man at the FBI choose to confide in a young metro reporter for 'The Washington Post' who had only been there for nine months? Three, Deep Throat is given credit by Woodward with the story of the destruction of the tape. How would Mark Felt have known about that?

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aim; bernstein; callgirl; campaign; chrismatthews; deepthroat; democrat; ggordonliddy; gordonliddy; headquarters; johndean; larryobrien; markfelt; maureen; maureendean; obrien; ring; washingtonpost; watergate; woodward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2005 6:34:06 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I had heard years ago that Dean's wife Maureen was a working call girl herself in that ring and there was documentary evidence to that effect at DNC HQ in Larry O'Brien's office and that is why Dean ordered the breakin


2 posted on 06/22/2005 6:48:22 PM PDT by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Armigerous
I get the feeling that Liddy is right.
3 posted on 06/22/2005 6:52:39 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
DITTO - I'd be far more inclined to believe Liddy than Dean
4 posted on 06/22/2005 6:56:08 PM PDT by lunarbicep ("Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve." - G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I'm old enough to have been watching the news in those days, and I seem to recall that some thought Dean was in it lots deeper. This makes sense.


5 posted on 06/22/2005 7:43:09 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Dean seems slimy to this day.


6 posted on 06/22/2005 7:47:07 PM PDT by Cate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I'd trust Liddy for more truth than Felt or W& B.


7 posted on 06/22/2005 8:06:31 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Dean was the main reason why Watergate happened. And that is why he's the one liberals treat as a hero.


8 posted on 06/22/2005 8:27:24 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Liddy has been consistent with this for decades. John Dean is scum.

I don't know if Liddy has ever said it, but I'm sure he regrets his gun-ho attitude and "following orders" because I'd have thought, given his brilliance, that he'd have questioned Dean. Or Dean's orders were, which were lies, sensible.

And I realize Liddy was the type of guy to really enjoy these "dirty tricks" because, as we all know, they are common place from both sides. Especially back then when the post-Vietnam political era started. But that doesn't excuse the fact he got caught.


9 posted on 06/22/2005 8:31:49 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Compassion is a great thing. Just quit making me pay for YOURS with MY money!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
"I'd trust Liddy for more truth than Felt or W& B.",br>

I agree. Liddy is a straight shooter. I believe that he knows the whole truth, and I think that it's exactly as this article indicates. Dean set it all up to expunge his wife's record before it got out into the open. The result was the destruction of a Republican president - all because of an immensely criminal, dishonest and disloyal act on the part of that particular little man - John Dean.

I was willing to relegate him to the shadows, but after he wrote his abominable anti-Bush book before the last elections, he lost all credibility with me.

He had some nerve attacking the truly splendid character of George W. Bush, when his own character is sorely lacking any redeeming features.

Char

10 posted on 06/22/2005 8:32:05 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Secondly, why would the number two man at the FBI choose to confide in a young metro reporter for 'The Washington Post' who had only been there for nine months?

IMHO a top level FBI official like Felt understood methods of human manipulation. He would know the dark side of our nature and how to exploit it. For example to bribe someone, start with something small and worthless -- and work your way up. Everyone knows it's wrong the first time. You have to gray out a person. After a while they won't know the difference.

Felt knew these ways of manipulation and much more. And he knew the stakes were high. How high we might never know, but we do know he chose reporters who wouldn't challenge his motives. He chose smart but inexperienced journalist. Young men with ambition and strong competitive urges.

I'll bet the first few leads he gave W & B were small -- but accurate. Not big enough to alert the more seasoned journalists. Not big enough to bring in top editors who might ask the wrong questions before the hook was set. But big enough to commit them to him. ( If you want someone to commit to you, offer them just enough so it's a hard choice - if you offer too much to soon, your "mark" won't have to internally rationalize his decision). It's why "A" students are harder on a teacher - and why the first time a man kisses some woman other than his wife it's more difficult than the last time he was totally unfaithful.

Compromise is always by degree.

Felt, with the position he held, would know some of the top news men of his day. And have easy access to them. They weren't what he wanted. Woodward was picked because he was young and somewhat inexperienced, not in spite of it.

11 posted on 06/22/2005 8:46:02 PM PDT by GOPJ (Deep Throat(s) -- top level FBI officials playing cub reporters for suckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Dean was playing both ends against the middle.

Liddy thought his orders were coming from the President thru Dean.

Dean was also telling the President things that he said was coming from Liddy and the gang, but it really was just Dean covering his A$$.


12 posted on 06/22/2005 9:03:34 PM PDT by chaosagent (It's all right to be crazy. Just don't let it drive you nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

bump


13 posted on 06/23/2005 1:15:05 PM PDT by GOPJ (Deep Throat(s) -- top level FBI officials playing cub reporters for suckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Secondly, why would the number two man at the FBI choose to confide in a young metro reporter for 'The Washington Post' who had only been there for nine months?

IMHO a top level FBI official like Felt understood methods of human manipulation. He would know the dark side of our nature and how to exploit it. For example to bribe someone, start with something small and worthless -- and work your way up. Everyone knows it's wrong the first time. You have to gray out a person. After a while they won't know the difference.

Felt knew these ways of manipulation and much more. And he knew the stakes were high. How high we might never know, but we do know he chose reporters who wouldn't challenge his motives. He chose smart but inexperienced journalist. Young men with ambition and strong competitive urges.

I'll bet the first few leads he gave W & B were small -- but accurate. Not big enough to alert the more seasoned journalists. Not big enough to bring in top editors who might ask the wrong questions before the hook was set. But big enough to commit them to him. ( If you want someone to commit to you, offer them just enough so it's a hard choice - if you offer too much to soon, your "mark" won't have to internally rationalize his decision). It's why "A" students are harder on a teacher - and why the first time a man kisses some woman other than his wife it's more difficult than the last time he was totally unfaithful.

Compromise is always by degree.

Felt, with the position he held, would know some of the top news men of his day. And have easy access to them. They weren't what he wanted. Woodward was picked because he was young and somewhat inexperienced, not in spite of it.

14 posted on 06/23/2005 1:18:11 PM PDT by GOPJ (Deep Throat(s) -- top level FBI officials playing cub reporters for suckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Liddy was on his son's radio show in Phoenix the day that Felt made his claim and I have to say that Liddy made a lot of sense. I was astounded that no one, not even the conservative radio hosts gave Liddy's opinion any weight.

Felt may have been the source for the original tip about the break-in, but I don't think that he did much more than that.


15 posted on 06/23/2005 1:19:49 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent
"Dean was playing both ends against the middle.

"Liddy thought his orders were coming from the President thru Dean.

"Dean was also telling the President things that he said was coming from Liddy and the gang, but it really was just Dean covering his A$$."

This is the best short, accurate summary I've ever read. I believe it's exactly the nub of the thing.

Great reply, chaosagent!

Thanks!

16 posted on 06/23/2005 1:51:54 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; Armigerous
Ditto on the old enough (can't we come up with a better marker than age!?) and I, too, recall that even at that time some thought Dean was much more involved and that it did have a lot to do with suspicions over his wife and a call girl ring.

I think Watergate was the seminal event that locked me into the "Dale Gribble Conspiracy Camp." Motto of the camp: "Nothing is as it seems."

LOL!
17 posted on 06/23/2005 1:58:57 PM PDT by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lunarbicep

Same here.


18 posted on 06/23/2005 2:00:46 PM PDT by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Apparently, Felt had met Woodward after the Wallace shooting. Felt was essentially running the investigation and Woodward was the Metro reporter the Post asisgend to cover the story.
19 posted on 06/23/2005 9:21:13 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

'Silent Coup' is one of the best books I have ever read. I HIGHLY recommend the book to readers who grew up in the '60s and '70s (as I did). 'Silent Coup' presents a genuine artifact of that time period - - takes you right back to those days. An amazing book.


20 posted on 06/23/2005 9:25:23 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson