Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group Apologizes for Comments Comparing Conservative Christian Group to Gestapo
AP ^ | 06/24/05 | Associated Press

Posted on 06/25/2005 10:56:24 AM PDT by Pikamax

Group Apologizes for Comments Comparing Conservative Christian Group to Gestapo The Associated Press

DENVER (AP) - A Washington-based interfaith religious group is apologizing for comments made by some of its members that compared a conservative Christian group to the Gestapo and the Taliban. The letter of apology released Thursday by the president of The Interfaith Alliance said the comments made in May about the group Focus on the Family were inappropriate for public dialogue.

"We regret that personal opinions expressed by individuals have been viewed as, associated with or confused with the organizational voice of The Interfaith Alliance," the Rev. C. Welton Gaddy wrote.

Clergymen representing the alliance denounced Focus on the Family for criticizing Democratic U.S. Sen. Ken Salazar's support of the Senate filibuster for federal judges.

Rev. Peter Morales, head of the public policy commission of The Interfaith Alliance, called Focus on the Family's stance "the actions of an American Taliban, of reactionary, religious zealots."

"This, my friends, is the Gestapo," added the Rev. Bill Kirton, a United Methodist minister, referring to the secret Nazi police during World War II.

Tom Minnery, vice president of Focus on the Family, criticized the remarks, saying, "If they had an intellectual argument, they'd use it, but the left is without argument, so they resort to name-calling. That demeans the process."

---


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nonapology; weaselwords

1 posted on 06/25/2005 10:56:24 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"We regret that personal opinions expressed by individuals have been viewed as, associated with or confused with the organizational voice of The Interfaith Alliance"

"We regret that certain comments have been associated with us"?????

That's no apology.

That's like OJ saying he "regrets being associated" with Nicole's murder.

2 posted on 06/25/2005 10:59:28 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Interesting


3 posted on 06/25/2005 10:59:38 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"We don't want you to connect that statement to our organization, although we can't disagree with it in public."

Another example of a reinforcing apology
4 posted on 06/25/2005 11:04:51 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Pikamax
...were inappropriate for public dialogue.

But privately we will continue to preach this word to our sheeple!
6 posted on 06/25/2005 11:17:15 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

If FOTF were really the Gestapo, the nimrod who made the comments would suddenly disappear and not be seen by family and friends ever again? Did that happen? Then FOTF is not Gestapo, QED .


7 posted on 06/25/2005 11:17:46 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

The original statements in these cases are always much more revealing than the non-apology.

Democrats hate Christians. Thats the subtext, the text, and the bottom line.

There is another issue. "Interfaith Alliance" is another of the offspring of McCain-Feingold. "Campaign Finance Reform" shifts politics from the above-ground party to a whole host of organizations which must maintain the legal fiction of independence but which are, in the end, The Party. "Interfaith Alliance" is the Democratic Party. MoveOn.org is the Democratic Party. The NAACP, sadly, is the Democratic Party. The human rights organizations which abound and agree that Bush is worse than Hitler are the Democratic Party.

There is no point to getting too worked up about what any of these people think. They are Democrats. The only difference among them is simply this; the "moderates" want the terrorists to win in Iraq because it would hopefully drive the Republicans from the White House. And the hard core want the terrorists in Iraq to win because it would weaken the American project in the world, which they view as fundamentally evil.

In either case, the Democrats have placed themselves in the position that a military victory is bad for them, and military defeat is good for them. Traditional American values are bad for them, and the silencing of those values is good for them. Traditional religious values are bad for them, and they continue to drive believing Christians and Jews from their ranks.


8 posted on 06/25/2005 11:19:35 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"We regret that personal opinions expressed by individuals have been viewed as, associated with or confused with the organizational voice of The Interfaith Alliance," the Rev. C. Welton Gaddy wrote.

So the "head of the public policy commission of The Interfaith Alliance" isn't associated with the "organizational voice" of the group?

9 posted on 06/25/2005 11:22:32 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christopher78
The left has basically aligned themselves with everything unholy. It's really amazing to watch something like this. They flatter themselves as being qualified to be arbiters of reason, but are the furthest thing from it.

Most Christians I know are convinced they are works in progress. The left is convinced they're already there, and are qualified to judge the rest as unworthy hypocrites.

At least true Christians are trying to live a decent life. The left makes no pretenses about what lives they live, and they approve of just about any behavior, except that of Christians.
10 posted on 06/25/2005 11:32:18 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Anybody keeping track of all these "apologies" flying around these days. We seem to have become a nation of apologizing girlymen.


11 posted on 06/25/2005 11:32:40 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

later read/ping?


12 posted on 06/25/2005 11:33:37 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Great point! These groups are like the paperbag puppets in the Fandango movie ads. They may look different on the outside, but they all have the same set of hands making their mouths move.


13 posted on 06/25/2005 11:38:47 AM PDT by RedRover (Fight the Wussification of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
We seem to have become a nation of apologizing girlymen.

'Never apologize son, it's a sign of weakness.' john wayne

It's not so much the apology, the sign of civility is not saying anything that you need to apologize for. If you do say it, be prepared to back it up.

14 posted on 06/25/2005 11:51:17 AM PDT by 11Bush (If the shootin' don't start soon, I'll have to mount the Ma-Duece on my wheelchair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Not all "christians" are "christians"..
Kind of like RINOs..
15 posted on 06/25/2005 12:05:12 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Re: #8; I've this before, but the truth is truth and should be said more often than the propaganda that it refutes.
16 posted on 06/25/2005 12:39:50 PM PDT by fella ("Ya don work, Ya don eat. Savvy?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I wonder whether they got hit in the pocket book for what they said initially and whether their members can read sufficiently to understand that this is not an apology. It is merely characterized as being what it isn't.


17 posted on 06/25/2005 12:44:23 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson