Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chevron 'likely to win oil bid' - (meaning that they'll beat out China, but don't hold your breath)
FINANCE24.COM ^ | JUNE 26, 2005 | Adrienne Taylor

Posted on 06/26/2005 8:09:18 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Boston - Some analysts and money managers here would pick Chevron Corp to beat CNOOC Ltd in the emerging race to acquire Unocal Corp, though they hope US politics won't be the deciding factor. CNOOC, China's biggest offshore oil company, has formally bid $18.5bn for Unocal.

That's about $1.5bn higher than the proposal by Chevron, which in April announced a pact it had hoped to seal within the next several weeks.

"I think Chevron's going to win because I think there will be some economic consequence to the regulatory hurdles that CNOOC has to do," money manager Mike Holland said.

Holland, whose firm oversees more than $5bn and owns Chevron shares, said one thing he doesn't want to see is CNOOC's bid's scuttled by Washington politicians who erect barriers to free trade.

"That would be a very short-sighted thing for us, hugely short-sighted," Holland said. "I don't look to Congress particularly to be a defender of Chevron's bid."

Michael Cuggino, president and portfolio manager at Permanent Portfolio Family of Funds, whose assets total about $370m, also picked Chevron as the likely winner.

CNOOC, which is controlled by the government of China, would expose Unocal shareholders to too much political risk, he said.

"There's not enough transparency in China right now - property rights are not as developed," Cuggino said.

The China risk aside, CNOOC's bid would also face a "regulatory battle" in the US, he said.

While Cuggino would like the US government to stay out of the process, "the reality is oil is in short supply around the world right now, Unocal is a United States company and we're not talking about $20 oil, we're talking about $60 oil," he said.

Randall Grace, an analyst at Chilton Capital Management, said Chevron may not have to better CNOOC's bid to get Unocal.

"The China bid faces political pressure from Congress, it's unfriendly and unsolicited," Grace said, adding that he believes the stock portion of Chevron's bid would be non-taxable.

The China bid is cash only at $67 a share.

Acquiring Unocal would give Chevron increased access to resources in one of the world's fastest growing areas, the analyst said.

"It (would give) them a dominant pan-Asian production footprint from Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan in the Caspian Sea to Indonesia, Thailand and the Pacific Rim," Grace said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: chevron; china; cnooc; economy; finance; global; international; investments; ltd; oil; politics; unocalcorp

1 posted on 06/26/2005 8:09:22 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

We don't let our own government buy businesses, how can we let foreign governments buy them?


2 posted on 06/26/2005 8:16:50 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I believe Chevron is looking at raising their offer.


3 posted on 06/26/2005 8:28:50 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

CNOOC is half the size of UNOCAL. UNOCAL is financially healthy. In theory UNOCAL could make a bid for CNOOC. That won't happen, but maybe it should. It would be interesting to see the Chinese reaction. It would illustrate that the Chinese company is not purely a commercial entitity. It is partly an instrument of Chinese foreign policy, which is why it would actually be appropriate for our government to block them from buying UNOCAL.


4 posted on 06/26/2005 8:56:04 PM PDT by openloop (everything is temporary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

i somehow think china can exceed any offer made by Chevron...


5 posted on 06/26/2005 8:57:37 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

>>> CNOOC, which is controlled by the government of China, would expose Unocal shareholders to too much political risk, he said. <<<

I don't understand. Unocal shareholders would receive all cash from CNOOC for their shares & then would have no ownership in Unocal. Maybe Mike meant Unocal employees.


6 posted on 06/26/2005 9:03:26 PM PDT by Otho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Isn't there a national security issue at stake here-- how do we let a hostile nation get a major foothold in our most precious resource?

I'm pretty free-market, hell I'm a Libertarian, but this seems like something the Fed should say 'no' to. Am I wrong here?


7 posted on 06/26/2005 9:24:49 PM PDT by agooga (Rise up against the black robed masters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson