Posted on 06/27/2005 5:22:48 PM PDT by kristinn
Even more clear for "Brian"...
The public believes that there is a Constitutional prohibition on citing scripture by judges from the bench (separation of Church and State), representatives from the Legislature, or teachers in classrooms.
Americans are prohibited from providing aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. It is in the Constitution. Congress needs to do its duty.
Thank you, weegee, for your responses. I spoke to another staff member in Hatch's office, who was appalled at Brian's big mouth. I also spoke with another phone answerer, Katy, in the office yesterday and she said, "yeah, Brian can be abrasive." Well, why do they keep such a dunderhead in a senator's office?
Your points are excellent and I will forward those to the senator's office also! Good work!
Communist Party USA
Revolutionary Communist Party
World Workers Party
International Socialist Organization
Thanks for going on the "frontline" and making the calls.
I was at my friends the other day and I noticed his next door neighbors have a Code-Pink bumper sticker on their truck (along with alot of other left-wing crap). When I told him what they stood for, he wouldn't believe it because they seemed like nice, average Americans. Since I showed him this article, I'm now worried about thier safety...nah.
"The left used to hate it when we supported authoritarian regimes that were against communism. The cried about the repression and human rights violations. Now when we change our policy and take down authoritarian regimes and spread freedom, they cry about the repression and human right violations. At least their consistent in their own warped way, they're still hard core communists."
ping!!!
Islam does not permit interest to be charged or earned. What is "conservative" about that?
Islam does not preach free will. If you convert away from Islam, you can be murdered.
The law puts Muslims, Jews/Christians (people of the book), and everybody else into 3 legal classifications (with diminishing rights depending on stature).
How many muslim nations still have royalty?
Communist front groups one and all.
Excellent post Kristinn. Thanks for exposing the truth about these so called "peace" loving reprobates.
Conservative: adj 1: resistant to change [ant: liberal] 2: opposed to liberal reforms 3: avoiding excess;
You're comparison would be valid *if* Islam had experienced anything like the Enlightenment. It hasn't. Categories of Left/Right and Conservative/Liberal simply do not apply when one is discussing a political system based upon a revealed religious text.
"You're comparison would be valid *if* Islam had experienced anything like the Enlightenment."
I'm just wondering. They are allies of the terrorists now? That means they renounced their citizenship, right? Any of them in Club Gitmo yet?
"Americans are prohibited from providing aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. It is in the Constitution. Congress needs to do its duty."
I was wondering about that. And also, what about their citizenship status?
And by the way, as you say, Conservative has a different meaning in different contexts. And that's why you (or others) shouldn't take offense simply because you may also be a conservative. I don't mean to infer any similarities between Islam and Christian convervatives...so relax.
Because of 1) naivite and/or 2) inward self-loathing.
The Soviet Union lasted a long time. Does this mean to overthrow their socialist government was a "liberal" act?
Islam does not have strong nationalism. It has a theocratic government. Nations mean nothing to them. ALL nations are to submit to their religious authority.
"Islam does not have strong nationalism."
You're simply arguing semantics, now. While true Muslims may claim not to recognize the so-called "nation-state" they certainly do recognize their own soverignty which they wish to preserve at all cost. No interlopers allowed. Hell, Iran is now an "Islamic Republic" with its own recognized borders.
Islam's so-called disenfranchisment with the "nation-state" is mearly a facade because of their diseffection with colonialism. However, when they were the imperialists, they didn't have such notions, as the Caliphates set up their own tribal regions. Call it what you want, but many in Islam still seek a Pan-Arabic "nation."
"Nations mean nothing to them."
Yeah...only because they think it is their right to annex other people's territory, borders be damned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.