Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GLOBAL ANTIWAR MOVEMENT DECLARES SUPPORT FOR TERRORISTS AGAINST US, UK
Monday, June 27, 2005 | Kristinn

Posted on 06/27/2005 5:22:48 PM PDT by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last

1 posted on 06/27/2005 5:22:49 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Anti-war movement supporting religious zealots in their quest to kill us all.

Makes perfect sense to me............
2 posted on 06/27/2005 5:24:45 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I believe it is time to start beheading people just for sympathy for the War on Terror.

(Hell it works for the Terrorists)


3 posted on 06/27/2005 5:24:56 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Any law or institution created under the aegis of occupation is devoid of both legal and moral authority.

Guess this means the Palestinian Authority is no more?


4 posted on 06/27/2005 5:27:09 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

LOL!! Except it's not really funny. The libs didn't mention that the terrorists are intentionally targetting civilians. How could any civilized person support that?


5 posted on 06/27/2005 5:27:41 PM PDT by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This so-called "Jury of Conscience" can Kiss My Ass!!!


6 posted on 06/27/2005 5:27:56 PM PDT by sauropod (Polite political action is about as useful as a miniskirt in a convent -- Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: tet68

I guess they like Sadam's regime better. Sheesh.


8 posted on 06/27/2005 5:29:30 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

How nice to finally see the cards that some thought were "hidden".


9 posted on 06/27/2005 5:30:12 PM PDT by mmercier (nothing new under this sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Global anti-war groups. They should talk to the leaders of the terrorist groups. Oh, wait, they might be the leaders of the terrorist groups.


10 posted on 06/27/2005 5:31:20 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

"Seconded."


11 posted on 06/27/2005 5:32:30 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Seems that they want to both judge and control matters of both legal and moral authority.

Now, does not that sound like Iran's approach to governing.


12 posted on 06/27/2005 5:33:06 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotokan

Thought you might enjoy this.


13 posted on 06/27/2005 5:34:38 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
we the Jury of Conscience declare our solidarity with the people of Iraq.

They mean the Iraqi terrorists. Most of the Iraqi people support whats going on from the polls Ive read.

Also, side with terrorists then die like them.

What is "The Jury of Conscience?" Some sort of UN scientology cult?

14 posted on 06/27/2005 5:37:05 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

The left used to hate it when we supported authoritarian regimes that were against communism. The cried about the repression and human rights violations.

Now when we change our policy and take down authoritarian regimes and spread freedom, they cry about the repression and human right violations.

At least their consistent in their own warped way, they're still hard core communists.


15 posted on 06/27/2005 5:37:06 PM PDT by listenhillary (FR is infiltrated with defeatists, socialists, pessimists, and fools all with intent to destroy us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
10. There is widespread opposition to the occupation.

Of course, the "resistance" is killing mostly other Iraqis.

16 posted on 06/27/2005 5:37:14 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

If my country is willing to swear in a pot-bellied, middle-aged soldier's dad with an ANSWER--sized chip on his shoulder, then this particular one is willing to help take out anti-American trash with extreme prejudice.


17 posted on 06/27/2005 5:37:45 PM PDT by niteowl77 (Dick Durbin's mouth has caused more deaths than my gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

It'll be interesting to see which democrats show up for the September ANSWER protests.


18 posted on 06/27/2005 5:38:04 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

http://www.notinourname.net/archive/mission-statement-aug03.htm

About the Not in Our Name Project
In March 2002, individuals from different organizations, backgrounds, communities and political perspectives met together at St. Mary's Church in Harlem, NYC, to discuss what was needed to build resistance to the U.S. government's "war on terrorism" launched in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. The group recognized that the government was embarking on a new openly imperial policy towards the world and a dangerous escalation in the curtailment of rights domestically. The Not in Our Name Pledge of Resistance and Statement of Conscience-Not in Our Name are the two living documents that were developed from the March 2002 meeting and express the essence of the Not in Our Name Project. Participation is open to individuals and
organizations that adopt the Pledge and participate in Not in Our Name-initiated and supported events and campaigns.







Here is our answer; We refuse to allow you to speak for all the American People... We refuse to be party to these wars and we repudiate any inference that they are being waged in our name or welfare. We extend a hand to those around the world suffering from these policies; we will show our solidarity in word and deed.

Not In Our Name Advertisement
New York Times, September 19, 2002


19 posted on 06/27/2005 5:39:06 PM PDT by listenhillary (FR is infiltrated with defeatists, socialists, pessimists, and fools all with intent to destroy us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I'm glad to see the Not in Our Name Project, United for Peace and Justice, Code Pink and ANSWER outed in this manner.

If the feds can tie these groups to the declaration of support for terrorists, it's time to either start deporting or incarcerating.

I here there's openings about 90 miles south of Miami.


20 posted on 06/27/2005 5:39:59 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson