Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Supreme Court rules in favor of power plant opposed by Illinois, environmentalists
San Diego Union -Tribune ^ | 6/28/05 | Jr Ross

Posted on 06/28/2005 9:51:44 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

MADISON, Wis. – Wisconsin regulators acted properly in granting permits for a coal-fired power plant outside Milwaukee, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in rejecting a challenge by environmentalists and the state of Illinois.

Environmentalists seeking to stop the $2.15 billion project argued the Public Service Commission did not do a complete review of the Wisconsin Energy proposal and failed to study whether cleaner-burning natural gas was a viable alternative to coal.

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan also intervened in the lawsuit, saying Lake Michigan and the states around it would be exposed to toxic mercury emissions and other pollution. Madigan said the coal-burning technology planned for the facility is banned in Illinois. Chicago is 80 miles from the plant.

The Supreme Court voted 4-2 to reject those arguments, saying the PSC followed the law when it gave its blessing to the project.

The twin-boiler plant along the Lake Michigan shore at Oak Creek, a Milwaukee suburb, would add enough electricity to power 615,000 homes. It is part of plant operator We Energies' $7 billion, 10-year Power the Future plan. The plant would run 24 hours a day, seven days a week.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: environmentalists; favor; illinois; opposed; powerplant; rules; supremecourt; wisconsin

1 posted on 06/28/2005 9:51:44 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

fyi

Go Wisconsin!

:)


2 posted on 06/28/2005 9:53:29 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Good news.


3 posted on 06/28/2005 9:53:57 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Watching one Government arm fight another would be much more fun if the taxer payer wasn't the sure loser.


4 posted on 06/28/2005 9:56:21 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I live in coal country (Pennsylvania). We could use a power plant like that around here.


5 posted on 06/28/2005 10:01:29 AM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

Maybe they should claim eminent domain and put up a spotted owl sanctuary.


6 posted on 06/28/2005 10:07:05 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Somebody needs to tell the attorney general of Illinois that the authority granted to her by the people of Illinois does not extend to the people of Wisconsin.


7 posted on 06/28/2005 10:36:16 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Somebody needs to tell the attorney general of Illinois that the authority granted to her by the people of Illinois does not extend to the people of Wisconsin.

California is trying to do the same thing to Nevada. After the big energy crunch in CA, Nevada put 6 new power plants on the fast track. All are situated next to the CA-NV border. Now the Caliweenies are screaming that the coal emissions will kill them all (never mind that prevailing winds blow from west to east).

8 posted on 06/28/2005 10:51:14 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randog

If California enviro-weenies start screaming, Nevada could put the screws into them and shut off their water power from the dam...It's time America started playing hardball with commie enviros!


9 posted on 06/28/2005 10:57:37 AM PDT by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Thanks, Norm! That is good news for my future utility bills.


10 posted on 06/28/2005 11:09:50 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randog

Glinda: Rubbish. You have no power here. Now be gone!


11 posted on 06/28/2005 11:49:42 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
saying Lake Michigan and the states around it would be exposed to toxic mercury emissions

Interestin. Any scientific evidence to support this?
12 posted on 06/28/2005 11:50:57 AM PDT by BJClinton ("Maybe his mother loved him, but I've never met anybody who does." - VP Cheney re: Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Those folks from Illinois have always acted that way toward the Badger State. They send their slob hunters up during deer season and trash the lakes, rivers, and streams the rest of the time.


13 posted on 06/28/2005 12:09:40 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (Getting old sucks, but it is the only viable option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson