You are ignoring my point and reinforcing it all at once. The point is that you cannot criticize Al-Qatami for sensing a steadily increasing intolerance for the peaceful practice of Islam, and then express the same hate that you just said did not exist.
The anger against muslims is something that they have cultivated and earned by the actions of their own people. Stop your people from beheading and slitting others throats in the name of allah and you might begin to get somewhere. That is where you need to start, not whining that people dislike a cult that's well known for killing people over their religion on a daily basis. When I can pick up a newspaper and not read that some muslim has blown up a church, synagogue, temple or whatever, I might feel differently. When muslim countries stop imprisoning or killing missionary's, I might think differently. When muslims stop killing their daughters because some pig raped them, I might think differently. And you talk of hate because a book was thought to have been burned? Give me a break. From what I have seen, islam is pure hate, pure evil. The difference is, I don't hate you. I don't want to slit your throat. My God would not want that of me but I do hate your religion and all the violence it stands for. Al-Qatami is right, there is a very real and increasing intolerance. It's for all the bloodshed in the name of islam. You are mistaken, however, this is not about the peaceful practice of islam. It's about the unchecked violence in the name of islam.