Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deep Impact tells a tale of the powder-coated comet
NASA via Spaceflight Now ^ | 7/8/2005 | NASA NEWS RELEASE

Posted on 07/10/2005 7:46:54 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

This false-color image shows comet Tempel 1 about 50 minutes after Deep Impact's probe smashed into its surface. The impact site is located on the far side of the comet in this view. The image was taken by the mission's flyby spacecraft as it turned back to face the comet for one last photo opportunity. The colors represent brightness, with white indicating the brightest materials and black showing the faintest materials. This brightness is a measure of reflected sunlight. The Sun is located to the right, out of the picture. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UMD
1 posted on 07/10/2005 7:46:55 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Does this mean we can ski on comet?


2 posted on 07/10/2005 7:48:15 AM PDT by demlosers (Allegra: Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Sure, but the lift ticket is kinda expensive.


3 posted on 07/10/2005 7:52:56 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." -- G.W. Bush, regarding Sen. Kerry's lack of vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Does this mean we can ski on comet?

I'm thinking the lift tickets might be a bit pricey. But if ya got it, flaunt it baby!

4 posted on 07/10/2005 7:53:25 AM PDT by Maceman (The Qur'an is Qu'rap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

The thing that surprised me was the craters on the surface. More akin to an asteroid.
Having learned comets were primarily balls of ice and seeing the comet appears to be a very solid object has me questioning what is being thrown off, causing the 'tail'.


5 posted on 07/10/2005 7:54:20 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; Smartass; neverdem

bttt


6 posted on 07/10/2005 7:54:21 AM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Powder you say?

Sounds like Bill Kristol might be interested in adding to his puff collection.

7 posted on 07/10/2005 7:55:43 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
re:an improvement by a factor of 10; 25 degree oblique angle relative to the comet's surface.)))

Hey, that's about the angle you use to hone and sharpen a kitchen knife...

8 posted on 07/10/2005 7:56:27 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

OK, so it is a dirty comet. Now what?


9 posted on 07/10/2005 7:59:01 AM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

It was STARDUST

And now the purple dusk of twilight time
Steals across the meadows of my heart
High up in the sky the little stars climb
Always reminding me that we’re apart
You wander down the lane and far away
Leaving me a song that will not die
Love is now the stardust
Of yesterday
The music
Of the years
Gone by



Sometimes I wonder why I spend
The lonely nights
Dreaming of a song.
The melody haunts my reverie
And I am once again with you.
When our love was new, and each kiss an inspiration.
But that was long ago, and now my consolation
Is in the stardust of a song.
Beside the garden wall, when stars are bright
You are in my arms
The nightingale tells his fairy tale
Of paradise where roses grew.
Though I dream in vain, in my heart you will remain
My stardust melody
The memory of love’s refrain.


10 posted on 07/10/2005 7:59:08 AM PDT by bert ( The final Crusade is possible......... just piss us off a little more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Vinnie
Having learned comets were primarily balls of ice and seeing the comet appears to be a very solid object has me questioning what is being thrown off, causing the 'tail'.

Glad to see someone else here thinks like me. (Does ice crater when impacted?)

And now "powder"? What could posssibly have brought this powder to the surface and keep it in place? The escape velocity from such a small mass must be next to nothing.

ML/NJ

12 posted on 07/10/2005 8:25:12 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


The powder is used to coat the fuel rods for the ISD's power plants. And the residual is filtered, melted and used for oxygen production.

That's what I hear, anyway....
13 posted on 07/10/2005 8:33:08 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Whacking comets causes hurricanes...


14 posted on 07/10/2005 8:37:26 AM PDT by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I've always questioned the ice theory.
Ice sublimes in a vacuum. How can there be ice on a comet, or the Moon for that matter?
Certainly over the millions of years these objects are supposed to have existed any ice would have long ago evaporated. IMHO anyway.( that is how they make freeze dried food)


15 posted on 07/10/2005 8:46:31 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

So now that the Flyby Craft has flown by and accomplished its mission, what will become of it? Will it keep flying on? Will we hear from it again?


16 posted on 07/10/2005 8:49:24 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Well, I guess I will be the one out-of-step on this thread. Spending a third of a billion dollars to penetrate a comet is pseudo-science at its worst and a huge waste of government (our) money.

NASA didn't do anything spectacular by crashing an object into a comet, they're well-versed in crashing space vehicles.

Frankly, I'm just not impressed by this so-called great "achievement".


17 posted on 07/10/2005 8:59:37 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Gee, maybe the technology could be adapted to strike an incoming missle...


18 posted on 07/10/2005 7:43:26 PM PDT by archaicoldschool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archaicoldschool
"Gee, maybe the technology could be adapted to strike an incoming missile..."

One of the stupidest objections raised to the proposed missile shield is the notion that it won't work.
19 posted on 07/10/2005 8:02:47 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Before the moon landings it was thought that the moon could be covered with a fine powder to a considerable depth, and that a lander could sink out of sight.


20 posted on 07/11/2005 11:37:28 AM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson