The law isn't tyrannical, unless you happen to think that everyone has a god-given right to get jacked up on Haloperidol. And someone who's under investigation usually isn't afforded the luxury of profound moral authority concerning the matter they're under investigation for.
Either you have the right to determine the contents of your own body, or you are the property/slave of the state. There is no middle ground on this one.
Given a law that says you are the property of the state, the tyranny of that law is self-evident.
Ultimately, the murder charges and 91 misdemeanor counts of medical fraud were dismissed. A jury acquitted Fisher of eight more fraud charges.
Whatever profound moral authority was afforded seems to have been horribly misplaced.
Haloperidol, or Haldol, is an anti-psychotic drug not noted for having potential as a drug of abuse. This casts doubt on your ability to comment intelligently on this subject. Narcotic drugs are in fact the treatment of choice for some sufferers from chronic pain. I'm not a libertarian extremist who advocates an end to all drug laws, but it appears that the government is completely out of hand, and its behavior is criminal in many instances.