Mohammad Sidique Khan, 30, working as a teaching mentor in a classroom at a school in the Beeston area of Leeds (©THE TIMES...)
Posted on 07/13/2005 6:58:28 PM PDT by minus_273
One of the bombers who brought carnage to London taught disabled children, it has emerged.
Mohammed Sadique Khan, 30, of Dewsbury, was a supply teaching assistant who taught disabled children in Beeston, it has been revealed.
A picture of him carried on the front page of The Times shows the bearded bomber caring for young children at the school.
The news came as police told Sky News they were hunting a fifth man involved in the plot to kill 52 people in Britain's first suicide strikes.
Sky News' crime correspondent Martin Brunt said: "Police have to assume that there were others working with these four."
The Times reported that the mastermind of the attacks was a Pakistani in his 30s who arrived through a British port last month but left a day before the bombings.
Detectives are piecing together the lives of the suicide bombers - four home-grown young men.
(Excerpt) Read more at sky.com ...
marking for later...
Sure. And Mafia capos are nice to their children, but I wouldn't want to cross one.
Seems to me that the Brits and Americans need to come up with a plan to drain the swamp in Pakistan even as the local alligator population is thinned out in Britain.
I wonder what the final tally will be of people disabled by this POS's bomb?
Mohammad Sidique Khan, 30, working as a teaching mentor in a classroom at a school in the Beeston area of Leeds (©THE TIMES...)
Given the Muslim male's traditional attraction to underage children both male and female, this monster was most likely using these children for his own sick needs.
I have a feeling that Italian Mafia took care of people who accidently even so kill kids
Money back guarantee if not completely satisfied... or if he lives. 
One well placed nuclear device should do the trick. Should not be too much trouble for the boys from Langley to make it look like an "accidental" explosion from the Paki arsenal. Indians should happy to assist.
I'd love to see a nuke detonated in Dr. Khan's shorts.
Even their own families can't predict their involvement.
They can be born US citizens, hold down regular jobs and be law-abiding citizens. When the "call" comes...they carry out what the KORAN has ordered them to do! Kill the infidels!
These Koranimals, by their appearances and actions, were so-called "moderate Muslims" to their friends, and co-workers.
Young British Muslim Journalist Condones AttacksLooks they they found a new term here:
The Guardian UK ^
Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:06 PM EDT by GermanBusinessExcerpt:
...Shocked would also be to suggest that the bombings happened through no responsibility of our own... The Muslim community is no monolithic whole. Yet there are some common features. Second- and third-generation Muslims are without the don't-rock-the-boat attitude that restricted our forefathers. We're much sassier with our opinions, not caring if the boat rocks or not.
Which is why the young get angry with that breed of Muslim "community leader" who remains silent while anger is seething on the streets.
Earlier this year I attended a mosque in Leeds for Friday prayers. It was in the month of Ramadan, when Islamic fervour is at its most impassioned, yet in the sermon, to a crowd of hundreds - many of whom were from Iraq - Falluja was not referred to once; not even in the cupped-hands prayers after the sermon was over.
I prayed my Eid prayer in a mosque in Sheffield and, though most there were sickened and angry about events in Iraq, the imam chose not to mention Falluja either. We "youngsters" - some now in our 40s - had seen it before. This was deliberate silence, in case the boat rocked.
Perhaps now is the time to be honest with each other and to stop labelling the enemy with simplistic terms such as "young", "underprivileged", "undereducated" and perhaps even "fringe". The don't-rock-the-boat attitude of elders doesn't mean the agitation wanes; it means it builds till it can be contained no more.
One mans terrorist is another mans "boat rocker."
So according to Dilpazier, this time, its not underprivileged, undereducated and all the usual stuff liberals obsess about, its the shocking behavior of the Imams who failed to call Muslims for their obligation to Jihad... sheesh. Where were the "boat rockers" when Saddam was massacring over 300,000 members of the ummah?
*Sound of crickets chirping at Al-Guardian*
Hmmm. Interesting piece.
You think maybe what that writer's doing is deflecting guilt from the clerics that preach jihad in the mosque? (That's how it reads to me.) He's a muslim, he's lying.
Someone's worried about the new legislation mooted in regard to reading from the koran to incite hate by the sound of it. (It's not the imams who recruit, it's all on our own initiative.) Bullsh*t!
Oh, definitely. What I thought was interesting was that the youth of Islam are angry and the writer admits it. Islam is a stew that has been brewing for 1400 years in this form, but, of course, as you know better than I, it started at the beginning of time. And it seems, at long last, to be ripe. PeeeeeU. Islam is ripe like a good stilton. Do you have stilton in OZ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.